A review of two DSC/GPS VHF Handhelds

Handheld VHF radios are essential pieces of safety gear for sea kayakers. A technology called Digital Selective Calling (DSC) is making handhelds even more indispensible for coordinating groups of paddlers and during emergencies.

The VHFs that sea kayakers have been using are analog transmitters/receivers for voice communications. Those radios now equipped with DSC have an additional digital transmitter/receiver for sending and receiving limited amounts of data such as GPS coordinates. With a DSC-enabled radio, you can press a distress button and a digital help message with your current GPS coordinates is sent to the Coast Guard (and other nearby vessels equipped with DSC radios). Here’s the lowdown on these “rescue me” radios.

Getting a Handle on DSC

DSC has been around for a while and is a popular option in the fixed-mount marine radios used in larger vessels. Within the past several years, DSC has finally started to show up in portable radios—thanks mostly to inexpensive GPS chips.

The Uniden Mystic was the first DSC/GPS handheld and was available circa 2004 at a cost of about $700. It was discontinued because of the high price, some reliability issues and because the Coast Guard’s DSC-based rescue network wasn’t available in a lot of places.

The technology for DSC has improved in recent years, and the cost of the components required has made handheld DSC-equipped radios more reliable and affordable. The two radios reviewed here are the most recent entries on the market and more manufacturers should be jumping on the bandwagon soon.

The United States Coast Guard has created a system called Rescue 21 that’s compatible with DSC radios. The system began being implemented in 2003 and currently covers almost all of the continental U.S. Coast and the Hudson and Columbia Rivers.

Each DSC radio has a unique identification number called an MMSI (Maritime Mobile Service Identity). When a DSC distress message is sent, the MMSI is transmitted to the Coast Guard along with the transmitting radio’s coordinates.

The Coast Guard uses the MMSI to retrieve information about the boat, its owner and emergency contacts from its database of registered MMSI numbers. This allows search and rescue responders to know instantly who’s in trouble and what type of boat to look for. The additional information provided to the database by the radio owner can speed up a rescue.

Registering an MMSI Number

DSC radios don’t come preprogrammed with MMSI numbers; you have to register to get one. The numbers are free and are available online at: www.boatus.com/mmsi/. You fill out a form and when you’re finished you’ll be assigned a nine-digit MMSI number to enter into your DSC radio. The information you provide on the form is added to the Coast Guard’s search-and-rescue database.

If you plan on using your DSC radio on different boats, say your kayak and sailboat, don’t associate an MMSI number with a specific vessel. Instead, in the online form’s Vessel Registration field (which accepts anything you type), enter “Handheld” and in the Remarks field, type “Handheld radio used on multiple vessels.”

Since the remarks can be edited after you get a MMSI number and are immediately updated in the Coast Guard’s database, you can specify which boat you’ll be using before any particular trip.

The BoatUS site is only for United States recreational boaters. If you live outside the U.S., check with your country’s Coast Guard or equivalent to see if DSC is available where you paddle and how to get an MMSI number. Canadians can download a form to register for a free number.

If you’re a U.S. citizen and plan on paddling internationally, it’s a good idea to get an MMSI number issued by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) instead of BoatUS. U.S. regulations require that a VHF radio to be used in foreign ports have an operator permit.

A cautionary note: When you program a new handheld with your assigned MMSI number, be sure to enter it correctly.

Because of government regulations, once an MMSI is entered in a radio it can’t be changed. If you make a mistake or buy a used radio you’ll have to send it back to the factory so it can be reset.

Using DSC Radios

A DSC radio works just like a standard VHF handheld with a couple of exceptions. In an emergency, open a red plastic tab on the side of the radio (make sure the radio is on). This reveals a red button. Press and hold the button for 3 seconds.

If you have time, you can select the type of emergency from an on-screen list of options. The screen will confirm that the help message with your coordinates has been sent, then automatically switch the radio to Channel 16, where rescuers will try to contact you by voice.

Keep in mind that DSC radios aren’t just for emergencies. They’re also very useful for group paddling trips. MMSI numbers from other DSC radios can be entered and stored in your radio’s address book. Select a name from the address book of someone you want to call; each name has a corresponding MMSI number.

His or her radio will start ringing with an alert tone and automatically switch to the same channel as your radio. You can start chatting. If you and other members of your group are monitoring Channel 16, you don’t have to first hail one another on 16 and then switch to another channel.

You can also request the position coordinates of any radio listed in the address book. The other radio will reply with its latitude and longitude, and its distance and bearing will appear on your screen. The radio can serve as a GPS and set a course to the other DSC-equipped unit.

(DSC doesn’t provide continuous tracking, so if the other radio is moving, you’ll need to make multiple position requests to get the current coordinates. The LHR-80 reviewed here has a mode that will automatically query every 15, 30 or 60 minutes.)

Hands-on with the Standard Horizon HX851 and Lowrance LHR-80

Currently, there are only two handheld DSC radios with built-in GPS on the market; the Standard Horizon HX851 and Lowrance LHR-80. These radios have all the features you’d expect with a handheld VHF radio. They are submersible and include weather channels (plus an alert option for NOAA weather warnings), adjustable volume and squelch controls, channel scan and a Channel 9/16 priority button.

Both are full-size radios; however, thanks to rechargeable lithium batteries, they’re fairly light. The HX851 tipped my scale at 12 ounces while the LHR-80 weighed in at 11.1 ounces. That’s not bad, considering my compact Icom M-88 radio weighs 9.7 ounces.

Like any good marine handheld, both radios are JIS-7/IPX7 rated; they can withstand an immersion in 1 meter of water for 30 minutes. As a bonus they both float. I dunked the radios in a bucket of water for 30 minutes, pulled them out, dried them off and checked for function and leaks.

Both worked normally. The LHR-80 had a small amount of water between the battery and the radio. The battery fits snugly against the radio case, but because there’s no gasket there, a little water got in. The sealed internal electronics are protected, and the battery connection points have small gaskets so some water in the battery compartment isn’t cause for concern. I’d still clean the inside surfaces after exposure to salt water to clean out any salt left after the water evaporates. (Check out the February 2009 SK issue for reviews of other floating and submersible radios.)

Most handheld VHF radios, including the LHR-80, transmit either at low (1 watt) or high (5 watts). The HX851 offers transmission power settings of 1, 2.5, 5 and 6 watts. When you’re sitting low in the water with a small antenna, the more watts the better. And speaking of antennas, I really liked the soft, flexible antenna on the HX851. It’s friendlier than most hard, rigid antennas; especially if you wear a radio mounted high on your PFD.

Both radios come with a built-in, 12-channel GPS chip. Latitude and longitude are displayed and, just as you can with a basic GPS, you can enter and navigate to waypoints—up to 200 with the HX851 and 500 in the LHR-80. Getting a lock on a satellite upon startup was quite fast with both models. Keep in mind that DSC portables only offer rudimentary GPS features; don’t expect color charts, routes, or turn-by-turn driving directions. A DSC radio is not a replacement for your handheld GPS.

One of the main differences between the two radios is the screen. The LHR-80 has a bigger screen compared to the HX851, with larger and bolder text that makes it easier to read. But readability on the HX851 is improved with the backlight turned on. In terms of usability, I preferred the buttons on the HX851. They’re slightly larger, have a better tactile feel, and a more logical layout compared to the LHR-80. Both radios have a number of settings, controlled by on-screen text menus.

Expect roughly seven hours of battery life with the HX851 and eight-plus hours for the LHR-80. The LHR-80 has a higher capacity battery (1400 mAh) compared to the HX851 (1150 mAh). An optional tray for powering the HX851 with 5 AAA batteries is available; essential for extended trips when there are no electrical outlets for recharging. The radios have power-saving settings which can extend use at the expense of turning off the GPS chip.

On the water, both radios had good audio quality while transmitting and receiving. When hailed by another DSC-equipped radio, both the LHR-80 and the HX851 emitted a loud ringing tone guaranteed to get your attention even in the noisiest conditions.

The HX851 has two unique features. A bright LED light is mounted in the radio’s face that can serve as a flashlight or strobe light. If the radio is turned on and is immersed in water, the light will automatically start blinking. Additionally, there’s a glow-in-the-dark band that surrounds the case making the radio easy to find in the dark.

Internet prices for the HX851 generally run between $225 and $270. The LHR-80 is priced from $175 to $200. While both of these radios are more expensive than basic VHF handhelds, the enhanced safety and convenience features of DSC and GPS make either of them well worth considering if you’re thinking about a new radio.

Freya and the Great Australian Bight

By the time this issue is delivered, if all goes according to plan, Freya will have finished, or be very close to finishing, her yearlong, 9,400-mile solo circumnavigation of Australia.

I spoke with Freya by phone on November 9th, shortly after she had finished the third, longest and last significant stretch of cliffs. She and her partner Greg Bethune, driving a support van, had rendezvoused at a beach east of the 112-mile long Bunda Cliffs and were taking a day off.

Some stretches of the highway along the Great Australian Bight are quite a distance from the water. Did Greg have any trouble finding places to meet you?

The first part of the section, from Albany to the end of the first Baxter Cliffs, the highway was a long way from the coast, not so much in miles but time. On some very rough bush roads, he could only travel at 10 or 15 kilometers an hour.

On the Bunda Cliffs he could often see me from the top, but when it got dark he would eventually fall asleep and I just kept on paddling. It was quite funny.

Was he able to keep in touch with you by phone while you were along the cliffs?

We have VHF radios, but the problem was the battery on Greg’s radio did not last long enough for him to entertain me continuously. I would have liked to have had his encouragement while I was paddling, but we had to keep things a bit shorter.

The satellite phone would have worked all the time, but with it I would have been talking instead of paddling. The VHF radio worked well but the battery wasn’t up to date. That’s just like it is. It was good enough for basic communication.

Are you progressing as well as you’d hoped?

If you follow Paul’s [Caffyn] schedule, that’s kind of what I’m aiming for too. Right now I’m about three days behind the dates of his schedule, so if I want to finish like him, before Christmas, on the 23rd, I need to catch up on those three days. I’m still 14 days ahead of him [Freya started at a later date than Caffyn, so she’s ahead of him in elapsed time], but I’m not really sure if it’s good to finish so close to Christmas or the first week of January.

My visa is running out on the 10th of January. I applied a couple of days ago for extending the visa, but there has been no response yet. I’ll make it in time before the visa runs out, but it’s still threatening. I would like to stay [in Australia] for a while after the whole thing.

Do you think shooting for the middle of December is too much of a rush?

I think it may be possible but it all depends on the weather. I can’t tell. Comparing to Paul’s schedule, he had a couple of days off later and I probably will have to, too. But as I said, I can’t speak for the weather. I’m able to paddle as long as he did, especially with an empty boat right now, but on the other hand Greg has to be off for two weeks in two week’s time to look after his business. So I will be alone again for a while, but that shouldn’t slow me down too much. Perhaps not at all.

I don’t have anything hard, I just have to island hop on the leg from the mainland to Kangaroo Island. So that’s the one [challenging] thing, but that’s all. I’m aiming for… well about 8 days before Christmas would be nice. I don’t know what’s better, publicity-wise. [In late December] everybody’s busy with Christmas preparations and the first week of January is when a lot of Australians have holidays.

If the weather slows me down I definitely won’t mind finishing the 2nd or 3rd of January, or something like that, but definitely not between Christmas and New Year’s. That’s stupid. Nobody would be there.

If you found you were on a pace to finish in that off week would you slow down?

I can’t say, sorry. Maybe I’ll just be happy to get it done and if I finish on the 25th, well, I finish on the 25th. Ideally it would be on the 20th or earlier when it is not so hard to get people together. It just depends on what the weather says.

The next few days are supposed to be nice so tomorrow I should be continuing. I didn’t have that many sores from that long night paddle [along the Bunda Cliffs].

How has the routine changed with the support from Greg driving the van?

Quite a bit, quite a bit. No doubt about it. It would be easier if we were an old couple, but we’re not an old couple. Still, it’s working out quite nicely. Getting the van set up was Greg’s main chore and I had only one day to spend with him to outfit the whole thing to suit our needs.

And on that day when I couldn’t paddle I needed to spend my time on the household stuff. After everything was set, it was just nice and comfortable to be helped at night with warm shower water and food and things. Can’t complain about that.

Greg does a great job. I doubt that the time I have to recover after a long day’s paddling is any longer, because we have to talk so much and there are different chores to be done around the van. But it is definitely nicer and more pleasant and entertaining. Simply different. It’s a fully different trip with a support crew.

Sometimes I have to push hard to get to the spot where he’s waiting and can get beach access. Sometimes I have to paddle shorter than I could because the next twenty miles may have nothing where Greg can get to the beach. So I have to adjust my paddling days and distances as well.

I’ve already pushed him to take four-wheel drive tracks that nobody else would have gone in, but he made it. Without four-wheel drive and without four-wheel driving skills it would be trouble. Greg is very impressed with where this van has taken him.

What has it been like getting to know someone during this trip?

It’s a stressful way. I have to paddle all day and he has his chores to do too to get to the next place to meet me, sometimes to shop and do laundry, to reconnoiter and to talk to local people to get information about coast access and tracks ahead. It’s not like there’s a paved road here. He has his fair share of work to do, too.

I’d imagined he’d drive ahead and relax on the beach waiting for you.

Oh, it’s only happened once or twice where he’s relaxed on the beach and caught fish while waiting for me. His time is quite short and he’s very happy to talk to locals about beach access. That’s quite important because in this part of the country there are few road signs on the tracks going through the bush and dunes to the beach. Sometimes the signs are hidden. Sometimes there are big hand-carved ones, but they’re not alongside the highway, they’re in the bush and we can’t tell how they got there. You have to go to the next roadhouse and ask someone where the next spot is or ask anyone you meet along the way.

GPS is very helpful in finding the tracks. Greg met some other four-wheel guys who were using aerial photographs. There simply aren’t any road signs and not many landmarks, especially not here in the bush and in these plains. There is simply nothing. You need to know where you want to go and have a compass and, these days, a GPS is very helpful. Talking to the locals is the best thing. Greg is very good at that and is a “local” anyway.

How is the drinking water situation?

The roadhouses have enough good quality rainwater that we can fill up. There are days where water is limited but we carry enough on the van. With the water bags full it’s not an issue. We have to save water but I’ll always have a shower at night, even if a tiny one. We’re never out of water.

Any groundwater comes from deep wells at roadhouses, etc., and apparently is very poor quality and often even salty. Eucla town had a desalinating plant. We have not had to buy the water like I thought. We ask and are given access to precious rainwater tanks—they’re the main source of water.

Are you done with cliffs now?

I’m done with the cliffs now, thank goodness. Three sets of them [Zuytdorp at 106 miles (171 km), Baxter at 102 miles (164 km), Bunda at 112 miles (180 km)] were more than enough. There may be some other cliffs ahead, but nothing that long.

The last two, the Baxter and the Bunda were somewhat similar because the water was quiet with no swell and I could paddle close. With the Zuytdorp Cliffs I had quite a bit of swell so I was paddling way offshore. I paddled a lot of it at night so I didn’t see much of those cliffs. The last two sets of cliffs were similar, though one was longer than the other, but it was basically calm water. Even when I had some wind going it was choppy but there was no swell, well, very little. Still enough to make me seasick though.

On the first set [Zuytdorp] I didn’t take my outriggers, but on the second set I had them out at night even though I had perfect conditions. There was bright moonlight—there was no lack of a visible horizon—but I still got seasick. There was a bit of rebound, and after throwing up a second time I thought “Now you need to pull out your floats.”

I was making great progress and throwing up made me feel much more comfortable. I was enough ahead of schedule on that two-day paddle I felt I could be a bit slow. For safety’s sake I paddled off the coast and into the wind so I think I made only 25 kilometers [15.53 miles] that whole night. Good enough to arrive at the end with decent daylight left.
When the sun was up again, I felt all right and could take off my floats and switch into normal fast-paddling mode.

The third set of cliffs was similar. I had the moon for the second half of the night and I put out my floats in the first dark half just for taking a few power naps. It was all feeling quite nice when I had my floats out. Then at midnight this big wind came up. It had been a calm but very warm and muggy day, and up until midnight a calm night, then it was 25 or 30 knots. Luckily it was a following wind—west-northwest.

I had to steer the boat a little bit away from the cliffs. I just sat there and got a bit of a push. It was not too bad but I didn’t get any catnap at all. I’d napped a couple of times before midnight. I survived about two hours of very strong following wind. Then the wind came down and came at me as a headwind but it was not that strong, just 10 to 15 knots. The moon came out at about two o’clock. At about 3 o’clock I took my floats off and started paddling. The headwind was just a bit too strong to paddle against with the floats on.

Luckily I had taken enough ginger tablets and had taken them early enough. That night I was thankfully without seasickness.

Have you only been getting seasick at night?

No, not only at night; I get sick during the day too. When I’m fiddling around too much—typing text messages, getting stuff out of the cockpit, putting things on.

When I switch into night mode that will set it off too. That’s why I tried doing things in stages on Baxter, the second set of cliffs, but that wasn’t working. I could have tried the ginger tablets [to ward off seasickness] but I just didn’t feel like taking anything. You can’t do much about seasickness when you’re already feeling the nausea.

I don’t mind throwing up. It’s all right usually. It takes maybe one time or two and then your stomach is empty and you’re done. That night it took more. It took five times. That was still all right. There was still some stuff coming out. It’s amazing what comes out of the stomach. But I have to say I had the advantage. I didn’t have to do number two the next morning. There was nothing left in the digestive tract.

You say it’s amazing what comes up. Were there things you didn’t remember eating?

Oh no, it was everything I had eaten, I reckon—a couple of oranges. Actually it was nice and dark and I didn’t look at what was landing on my spray deck. I was continuously staring ahead. I’d just let it go until I was done. Why should I look in detail at what was down there? It probably wouldn’t make me feel much better. I’d just wash it off and keep on going.

How’s your weight? 

Hmm. It’s all right. I’m not really thick and I’m not really thin. I think I’m quite good. I had a chance in a roadhouse to look at a bigger mirror and thought, “I’m not getting younger.” Without things plumped up nice and round by fat, the skin starts to hang here and there. No more details, nothing that can be printed.

With another month and almost 1,000 miles left to go—a distance that would be an expedition in its own right—are you thinking that you’re very close to the finish?

Oh yes, I’m almost done. It’s longer than going around Iceland, that distance I’ve got left to do, but that’s all right. I’ve done everything that’s really tough and I reckon the next leg won’t be that tough. There’s one 200-kilometer [124 miles] stretch of beach, Coorong Beach, which might be kind of fun, but I don’t know. We’ll see how it looks, whether if I can land or not land. Paul had a little trouble there. We’ll have to see how the wind and surf situation is there. I hope when I get there Greg will be back from his business trip.

I must admit I’m ready to be done. I simply need more mental input, rather than just planning the next day, landing and weather and stuff. It’s getting boring. I need more to think about, more to talk about, and more to deal with. More to manage and to organize. Even Greg thinks it has become quite the same routine only after six weeks . He’s not really happy that he has to go for this [charter] business trip on his own boat, but it will give him something else to do. He’ll be back, we’ll finish the whole thing and we’ll be done.

Every day is a different day, and every day we’re staying in different places and every day brings different things but still, I’d be happy to do some other sport as well at this point, and see something different. This morning I was doing a bit of driving in our van to go to a roadhouse for fuel and a shower. It was fun doing something different.

Does Greg have time to talk?

You’ve been providing support while Freya has done a couple of long stretches of cliffs and been battling seasickness. What has that been like from your perspective?

You know, with everything else she’s dealing with on these extremely tough sections, you, being a kayaker, can imagine perhaps better than I, you don’t want to be seasick as well. The mental strain of it all, then when it’s rough, and dark, there’s no visible horizon, you’re in survival mode and you’re sick, it’s pretty nasty. I feel a bit sick at times too.

It’s not without worry for me you know. If she tells me she’s going to call at two o’clock in the morning and she doesn’t call until half past two, then that’s 30 minutes of worry for me, thinking of the worst and wondering what’s going on. It’s very stressful. But everything has turned out all right and she’s going fine now and the worst is over. It’s the homeward stretch now.

It seems that you’ve been pretty busy. Has it been more work providing support than you thought it might be?

Yes, it has been more than I thought. Although she might only paddle 60 or 70 kilometers [37 or 43 miles] for the day, I thought when I was planning this trip that distance is no more than an hour’s drive in a motor vehicle and I’d have the rest of the day sitting around doing marketing [for my business] or something on my laptop. It’s not that at all.

Quite often I’ve got to drive 300 kilometers [186 miles] to get back to the highway, drive along the highway and then find a track that I might only be able to drive 13 or 15 kilometers [8 or 9 miles] per hour on very slow tracks. It’s been many, many days where I’ve actually arrived after she’s landed, you know, and she says something like, “What you been doin’ all day?” and I say, “Bloody hell, I’ve been very busy, thank you very much. I’ve done the laundry and I’ve bought some food and I’ve done this and I’ve talked to these people and I’ve talked to those people.

And that way we were going to go isn’t right and won’t work because that track’s not there and we have to come in this way…” Australian bush people are very genuine salts of the earth and very much fun to talk to.

It’s been very interesting and certainly not boring. Yeah, it’s been very pleasurable for me. The Great Australian Bight is a drive that not everybody does. People ask if I have driven the Great Australian Bight and now I can say that I have.

We haven’t done it on a highway. Very, very few people have driven the Bight the way I have, on the tracks along the coast, which there are a lot of, you know. I’m not on the highway sharing the road with big semitrailers and all the gray nomads with their caravans and motor homes.

We’ve been rolling along seeing some absolutely magnificent countryside and a coast that is spectacular. These cliffs are probably the most spectacular landforms that I’ve seen in my career.

Have you had any experience as a kayaker?

No. As a kid I had one my dad made when I was 8 years old. I’ve lived and worked on the water as a professional career since I was 18 years old. I’ve mucked around in them but I would not say I’m a kayaker by any stretch of the imagination.

What did you think when you first met Freya?

I had my charter boat on the dock at my home port and one of my crew said to me, “There’s a woman paddling a kayak around Australia who’s looking for you for some local knowledge. My first thought was, “Yeah, here’s another nutter.” I’ve seen other people go past doing different things—sailing to New Guinea on sailboards and what have you. But when I met her I changed my mind a little bit. She’s very well prepared and well organized and stunningly attractive, as you well know. The rest is history.

You must have developed a fair bit of admiration now that she’s paddled around most of the continent.

That’s right. I jokingly say to people, “It’s a good thing she became my girlfriend during the trip because if she was my girlfriend prior to the trip, one of two things’d happen: She wouldn’t do the trip, or she wouldn’t be my girlfriend.”

Cold and Alone on an Icy River

Friday, February 19th, the weather was better than it had been in some time with temperatures in the upper thirties and overcast. I knew I couldn’t make a Saturday trip with friends and I was in the mood to paddle solo.

My plan was to launch into the Mississippi River from the gravel ramp at the Foley, Missouri access, 3.5 miles above the Winfield Lock and Dam and paddle upstream in the calm, slow-moving water sheltered from the main channel by a string of islands.

On my return I could easily pop out into the main channel and return downstream to my car. I realize the risks of paddling alone. Even my wife, who rarely paddles, had heard enough discussions that she voiced some concern about my decision to paddle solo in the Mississippi River. The Foley access is one of the closest to my home and I paddle there frequently either solo or with the St. Louis Canoe and Kayak Club.

It has been a long time since I unintentionally flipped a sea kayak, and far longer since I had to wet exit, so I felt quite secure paddling in a familiar setting on calm water.

Getting my QCC 700 kayak ready to go, I stowed my spare paddle—a two-piece Euro-blade—on the front deck. I’d paddle with my mainstay Greenland paddle. My paddle float and pump were already in the aft compartment, often stowed there during transport, and I decided to leave them there. I felt they wouldn’t be needed for a flat-water paddle, although they were still available. I knew there was phone service in the area so my cell phone joined my wallet and car keys in the dry bag with basic gear I always carry.

In the back hatch with that dry bag were some snacks and a sports drink in case I chose to land along the way. Over my insulating poly base layer I wore splash-proof nylon pants, a fleece pullover and rubber-soled booties with waterproof socks. A breathable rain jacket, knit watch cap and waterproof neoprene gloves completed my gear. I had a hydration pack and new camera secured to the PFD I was wearing.

At the river’s edge there was an apron of ice about 3 feet wide and not quite a quarter inch thick. I used a fallen tree branch to clear a path through it. Launching into the slough and paddling near the shore brought me in sight of a few bald eagles, several pelicans and other waterfowl, most just out of camera range. The large flights of waterfowl passing high overhead were a sign that spring was on the way.

Widely scattered rafts of ice were drifting in the gentle current; I took several photos of one and even tried setting my camera on the ice for a self-portrait but was unable to get far enough away for a decent picture. Once I heard a loud ripping sound and turned to see the gentle current shred the quarter-inch ice over a log snagged on the river bottom.

A few times I heard a loud metallic racket in the distance. Not being able to determine the source, I assumed it was coming from the lock and dam downstream.

After an hour of zigzagging up the slough taking pictures I reached the head of Jim Crow Island. I heard more metallic clanging, first upstream, then across the main channel. It finally dawned on me that the noise was caused by rafts of ice striking the marker buoys in the navigation channel. Thinking this would make an interesting video I headed out to the middle of the river to the nearest buoy.

While there were more and larger rafts of ice moving down the main channel, it was still no problem crossing between them. It was amazing to see how the quarter-inch thick sheets of ice moving a few miles an hour could knock the several-hundred-pound buoys about so violently. I took a video of the buoy as I drifted downstream with the ice.

I had to pick a route through the ice floes as I headed back. While there was a clear path down the left side of the river, from this distance I wasn’t able to see an easy way to cross the channel to get back to the landing. An hourglass-shaped sheet of ice beside me left only about thirty feet of ice blocking an easy crossing. I decided to become an icebreaker, something I’ve done several times before, although usually in a plastic kayak rather than in my Kevlar boat.

Ice breaking in a kayak is fun, but you don’t move very fast. You chop the paddle down to punch a hole in the ice, then using that anchor point you slide ahead until the boat’s weight breaks the ice beneath it. With only six or eight feet of ice left between me and open water, I brought my paddle down to make one last anchor point; instead of punching a hole in the ice, the blade hit and skidded across it.

I was suddenly upside down. I made two unsuccessful attempts to roll up and while both attempts got my head above water, neither was good enough for me to stay upright. I’d never had a problem with gasp reflex underwater, but I was definitely gasping when I surfaced.

I bailed out and came up on the left side of the boat. My first thought was: “You have minutes to do something.” I could feel the icy water on my legs. I had chosen not to wear a wetsuit, assuming I wouldn’t need one for a flat-water paddle.

Previously our club’s coldest day out paddling had been 9° F and I had worn a drysuit that day, but the suit had worn out since then and I hadn’t replaced it. Unfortunately on this day, the coldest I had paddled solo, I was in trouble wearing only a poly base layer and a fleece pullover under nylon pants and a waterproof jacket. Only my neo gloves worked well in the water. My cap had fallen in the water and I threw it in the cockpit, but I didn’t notice the cold on my head.

I turned the boat upright and popped the cover off the back hatch. It was a simple matter to grab the paddle float. I had it mostly inflated before I thought to put it on the paddle. During the paddle-float rescue I put my foot on the paddle to climb in, and the boat leaned over taking water into the cockpit and open back hatch.

I knew this wasn’t working but didn’t immediately grasp why. Thinking it was better to call for help too soon rather than too late, I opened my drybag and found my cell phone. I was afraid I would drop it into the water so I held it over the open hatch.

That made it hard to see the keys to dial 911. The call to 911 failed twice; then I noticed there wasn’t any signal strength showing on the screen. This was odd since I’d heard my phone signaling an incoming message shortly after launching and I’d made calls from the shore on other days.

I thought that if I could swim the boat through the remaining ice, the current would carry me toward the car while I worked on a self-rescue. It soon became evident I could not swim through quarter-inch thick ice as fast as I needed to. The thought crossed my mind that maybe I should tie myself to the boat to make it easier to find my body, but I wasn’t willing to give up yet.

It then dawned on me that I had not finished inflating my paddle float. That explained the failure of the first self-rescue. I blew more air into the float and tried again. I was able to get myself belly down on top of the boat and even take a moment to slide the paddle under the bungee more securely. As I started to rotate my body upright, a wrong shift of my weight dumped me back into the water on the right side of the boat, away from the outrigger. This was probably the low point for me.

Fortunately, the partly flooded boat did not flip and dump all my gear into the water. I once again repeated my mantra for the day—“you have only minutes”—and I kept moving. Pulling my marine radio from the deck bag I struggled to control my gasping, then made a Mayday call twice and listened for a reply. Silence. Changing the power from one to five watts I tried the Mayday call again. Still no reply. That’s when it really sank in that I was on my own.

Moving the paddle float to the right side I saw my pump in the hatch and put it in the cockpit. Then, gingerly climbing onto the flooded boat, I was able to get completely out of the water. I took a minute to rest. The rest of the paddle-float rescue went just as it’s supposed to with one hitch, sitting up in the cockpit I realized I was on top of my pump. If I’d had feeling in my lower extremities I’m sure it would have been uncomfortable.

A couple attempts to reach the pump convinced me the flooded boat was too unstable to risk pulling the pump out. It was under my right hip on the seat and the float was now on that side. I’m not sure of my thought process at the time but I didn’t feel I could get it out without shifting my weight to the left and capsizing again to that side.

I knew I couldn’t survive going in the water again. Deciding not to remove the paddle float, I very gingerly retrieved my spare paddle. The three inches of water in the cockpit didn’t help with the cold I felt or my stability. Working through the remaining ice was uneventful and soon I was in open water.

Paddling back was a slow, methodical process. I remember trying to reach the pump once or twice and was stopped by the boat’s lack of stability. I remembered a chemical hot pack in my jacket pocket. I felt around but it was under my PFD and I wasn’t willing to tempt fate by trying to get it out. I did take a moment to drink from my hydration pack. I hadn’t realized till then how thirsty I had become.

It was about one half mile to the car and for the last several minutes I noticed my vision getting dark around the edges and a roaring in my ears that almost covered the usual river noises. I don’t really remember shivering much during the paddle. Pulling into shallow water and attempting to dismount resulted in landing on my butt in six inches of water. The next attempt got me on my feet and I dragged the boat ashore. I immediately went to the car and got it started.

Before long I had wet gear spread out all over the landing. My PFD and wet clothes were scattered on the ground, the roof racks and roof of the car. I changed into dry clothes but I didn’t remove my soaking briefs. I don’t know why, but that certainly caused me to take longer warming up.

Back in the car I got a couple drinks of Gatorade but I was soon shivering violently. I found a chemical hot pack and stuck it to my shirt near my armpit. Weighing my options, I knew I couldn’t load my boat and I wasn’t willing to leave it unattended.

With my cell phone now working and slightly damp, I called my friend Mark. He lives nearby and we often share rides to and from trips. As soon as I spoke Mark asked what was wrong with me. Hearing I’d taken a swim and needed help loading my boat was all it took to get him on the way.

A few minutes later a car with two men and a pickup with another guy pulled up. Seeing the debris field between the car and the water and taking one look at me, the pickup driver came over and asked if I needed help.

They all offered to load my boat, so with minimal instruction and even less real help from me they pumped it out, put it on the roof rack, tied it down and helped me pick up the scattered gear. I was still shivering violently, so the pickup driver urged me to get back in the car, saying he’d stay till Mark got there. Most people on the river are decent, hardworking souls. These guys were some of the best.

Within a few minutes Mark arrived and the pickup driver left before I could properly thank him. Looking over the situation, Mark took my Gatorade and began heating it on an alcohol stove he’d brought with him. I have to say hot grape Gatorade tastes terrible, but it felt really good!

Sitting in my car Mark gave me another hot pack and found that I had turned the car’s blower on high but hadn’t turned the heat up. He dialed it up and that helped warm me, but not nearly as much as the warm drink. Fortunately, Mark had put it in a spill-proof cup or I would have worn it. He still had to do a lot of coaching to get me to drink. I tended to just hold the warm cup, pant and shiver unless told to do otherwise.

The warm drink worked its magic quickly. Even though Mark had offered to follow me home and help unload, by the time we reached the highway I told him I could make it on my own and we parted ways. I had nagging thoughts that someone may have heard my Mayday call and started an unnecessary search, so I phoned the lock and dam to make sure someone knew what happened. The lady who answered the phone told me they only monitor Channel 12 for lock operations and do not monitor Coast Guard Channel 16. No search had been initiated.

When I got home I put together a timeline from time stamps on the camera and cell phone. The 911 calls weren’t completed so they didn’t register in the phone log.

About 12:15 – Launch
12:21 – First photo
1:20 – Last photo at the head of Jim Crow Island
1:35 – Video of buoy
2:21 – Called Mark
3:40 – Called lock and dam

Time was a very relative thing that day, but I’m estimating I spent about ten minutes in thirty-something-degree water. Assuming I dumped about ten minutes after the video and called Mark about ten minutes after landing, that leaves sixteen minutes to paddle from near the head of Turners Island to the ramp just over one-half mile away.

Lessons Learned

I had filed a float plan. My wife knew where I was going and when I planned to be back. However, given the limited survival time in cold water, a float plan may have only indicated where to look for the body. The single best thing that I did was never give up.

Every time one attempt failed, I moved to the next. While I was making calls for help I was thinking of what to try next. I knew even if a call for help got out, I had to get back aboard my kayak. Staying in the water till help arrived would have been fatal. Paddling upstream first is always a good idea. Whether you’re tired, hurt, or just late it’s always best to have the easy downstream or downwind leg at the end of the day.

What I did wrong: Not listening to my wife. Even if things go well, that’s always a bad idea. Going solo is not necessarily wrong but when you do, it has to influence every decision you make from then on. Going into the navigation channel was probably OK; my decision to cross the channel between ice floes was questionable.

Deciding to break through the ice was definitely a bad choice. Getting among ice floes at any time can be dangerous. If the ice had jammed up on an island or sandbar, the current would have crushed the floes together. Being caught in its midst would be dangerous for a person in a boat and almost certainly fatal for a swimmer.

Not dressing for immersion in 30° water was a critical mistake. I didn’t then own a drysuit, but even my wetsuit would have kept me much warmer. Proper cold-water immersion wear would have led to better composure, fewer mistakes and a quicker self-rescue.

I wear a wetsuit when paddling whitewater where the odds are good I will roll and probably swim, and the protection it offers makes a big difference.

Several weeks after the incident a friend pointed out a sale on semi-dry suits. My wife insisted I get one, so I did. I wasn’t going to repeat the mistake of not listening to her.

Doing a radio check before launching would have told me no one in the area was monitoring Channel 16. The lock tenders monitor Channels 12 or 14 and while they have no capacity for rescues, they could have called 911 for me.

I hadn’t been practicing rolling last summer as much as usual. In the ice I think I rushed and overpowered the Greenland paddle. The paddle works best for me with a very slow sweep and more of a gentle knee lift than a hip snap. I feel my roll is less reliable with a Euro paddle but with it I complete half of my rolls in cold whitewater.

All of my failed rolls have been in shallow whitewater where I’m bouncing off rocks and can’t seem to get set up properly. In the past I have sometimes dealt with an unsuccessful roll by switching to a sculling roll, which may have worked in the ice had I thought to try it.

I demonstrate paddle-float rescues at our club’s safety clinics but because it’s a technique I feel confident with, I don’t regularly practice it. More practice may have helped it work the first time. Leaving the paddle float and pump where they were stored in the back hatch was another critical mistake.

Had I placed the pump and float in their normal position on the back deck, when the first reentry attempt failed, the kayak’s buoyancy would not have been compromised by water getting into the open rear compartment. Had the pump been secured in its place it would have been available to clear the cockpit after my successful reentry.

Without the pump under me I would have had my weight lower in the boat and therefore would have been more stable. Getting the water out of the kayak would also have restored its stability.

I survived the day more intact than I had any right to expect. I had two palm-sized bruises on my right thigh, perhaps from sliding out of the thigh brace during the wet exit, and right calf probably from the coaming. I also had some numbness of the skin in my midsection.

My doctor said it was inflammation of the nerves. It’s almost totally gone and improving. He also said my darkening vision was possibly low blood pressure brought on by shock or hypothermia. He explained that during initial submersion all the blood vessels constrict, forcing blood into your core. As hypothermia gets worse you lose the ability to constrict the vessels and they relax, dropping your blood pressure—the same effect that shock has. The doctor thought that dropping blood pressure would have caused the roaring in my ears.

I think about that day a lot and it will definitely influence my decisions on future trips. Two days after the swim my wife and I went to see the movie The Wolfman. One of the characters was in an 1880s mental institution and as part of his “therapy” he’s strapped to a chair and lowered into a tank of ice water. That was hard to watch and caused me to tense up enough that my wife asked if I was OK.

Time can take on new meaning as quickly as a kayak can flip. Resting on a warm beach we can while away a few minutes with barely a thought. Submerged in icy water gasping repeatedly as your body reacts to it’s warmth streaming away in the current, every thought races past and you try to grasp their importance and cling onto the thoughts that will help you.

Our comprehension of the river can change just as quickly as we make the transition from kayaker to swimmer. Sure it’s just a flat-water paddle—so what if it’s colder than last time I was here? It’s easy to dismiss these concerns because we have no intention of swimming.

But we can’t control the water, and that’s part of what draws us to it. When we make that sudden transition from kayaker to swimmer, the outcome hinges on choices we’ve already made, maybe days before, when we were on land, warm and dry. Good decisions should come and go instinctively. But you will ponder a poor decision for the rest of your life, be that decades or minutes.

Five New Deck Bags

Another paddler – a complete stranger, in fact – once described me as “bristling” with safety gear. While I thought that was a bit much (“festooned,” maybe, but hardly “bristling”), I certainly do consider myself to be safety-conscious – which is partly why I’ve always been a strong proponent of deck bags.

Although I always keep several meteor flares, a strobe, a mirror, and knife on my PFD, I also insist on having my two-way radio, a few extra meteor flares, sometimes a parachute flare and even, depending on circumstances, an EPIRB, within easy reach.

A deck bag functions as a single, secure repository for this stuff, along with things of much more frequent but less pressing need, such as snacks and water.

For years I used a simple and inexpensive nylon deck bag that kept my gear together and readily accessible, but did nothing to keep water out. Anything inside that could be damaged by moisture was in a ziplock bag or waterproof case.

This worked okay, but it was awfully fussy at times. If I wanted, say, the bird guide to which I refer frequently, I had to open the deck bag, fish out the ziplock containing the book and open that, and stuff the ziplock back in the bag so it wouldn’t blow away, by which time the black-browed albatross I swore I’d spotted was long gone.

In addition, while the deck bag didn’t do much to keep water out, it seemed remarkably efficient at keeping it in. One dumping wave early in the morning was sufficient to keep the contents of the bag damp all day.

Photography was also a pain. Since I use 35mm SLR equipment, dry storage is essential-but so is fast access. One morning on the Sea of Cortez, I had just spotted several whales coming my way, running with the brisk tidal flow that surges past the midriff islands.

My camera was in a roll-top dry bag bungied on top of the deck bag, along with a wide-angle zoom and a short telephoto. The longer lens I figured I’d need was in a small case behind me. I parked my paddle and pulled both bag and case on top of the spray skirt while the sound of spouting drew nearer and nearer. I opened the waterproof case, opened the dry bag, juggled lenses, and that’s when a big fin whale rolled out of the water and blew, headed straight toward me not 30 feet away.

Gee, I guess I didn’t need that long lens after all.

All I could do was hang on to my $2,000 worth of exposed equipment while the boat rocked in the whale’s wake and a fine mist smelling of chum settled over me. There had to be a better way.

The solution to all this seemed obvious. When I got home I called around the country, but no one had anything like what I described, nor did anyone seem too keen on making something to my order.

That was several years before the first completely waterproof deck bags became widely available. Now, at last, the idea seems to have caught on. There are several completely waterproof models around, and a number of what you might call “sort-of” waterproof versions-water-resistant bags utilizing zippers that will keep out most water short of a dumping wave or a dunking.

I’ve been using a waterproof deck bag now for five years, with totally satisfactory results-which is to say, I haven’t drowned a camera yet. My bird book is right there when I need it, along with a bunch of other things freed from their baggies.

I feel better having my waterproof binoculars and VHF radio away from constant salt-water exposure.

Un-soggy granola bars are just a bonus.

However, make sure you have your priorities straight before buying one of these bags and chucking vulnerable electronics inside. I am constantly aware that there is just one layer of protection between the ocean and my camera’s 6-volt innards.

If it’s raining or the sea is rough, I not only can’t get my camera out, I can’t open the deck bag to get anything else in it. If you want to use a waterproof deck bag in all conditions, think of it as a secondary layer of security: Anything likely to get damaged by water gets ziplocked first and then put inside.

A deck bag leads a much harder life than the dry bags you carry in the cargo holds. It is constantly exposed to splashing, and often to strong dumping waves. The sun beats down on it, leading to ultraviolet deterioration, and it is subject to abrasion from paddles and botched landings.

So the choice of materials and the quality of construction are of vital importance if you expect to maintain watertight integrity. So is maintenance: I carefully inspect my deck bag before every use by holding it up to the light and looking for leaks, and I make sure the zipper is well-lubricated and free of debris.

I tested the five bags reviewed here first in normal, boat-mounted usage. Afterwards I lined them up and subjected each to a thorough dousing with a hose, trying in particular to squirt water past the zipper.

Then I completely dunked each one in a tub and held it there for 30 seconds-a longer immersion than one would expect from a capsize and roll.

Watershed’s Aleutian

The quality of Watershed’s products never fails to impress me, and the Aleutian continues the tradition that began with the company’s bombproof duffels and dry bags.

The Aleutian is made from an extremely strong polyurethane-coated nylon fabric, with seams that are radio-frequency welded rather than glued. Polyurethane has a couple of advantages over the less expensive and more common PVC (polyvinyl chloride) or simpler urethane coatings.

Watershed says polyurethane has four times the abrasion resistance of PVC, a claim I have no reason to doubt after abusing both materials. Just as importantly, the polyurethane coating, which is embossed with a fabric-like pattern on the outside of the Watershed bags, creates a very slick finish, unlike the slicker-looking but grabbier PVC.

If you poke a PVC-coated bag at an angle with the point of a knife (simulating any number of sharp objects that might accidentally poke it in real life), it tends to dig in, whereas on the polyurethane it’s more likely to skid off, decreasing the chances of a puncture.

Polyurethane is supposed to remain more flexible in cold weather, although the Sea of Cortez, even in January, was no place for me to confirm this. Finally, polyurethane application is a more environmentally benign process than PVC. (The same holds true for welding seams instead of gluing them.)

Watershed’s closure system resembles an oversized ziplock closure, with fat rubber lips you squeeze together, and two tabs that you pull apart to open it. It’s much easier to operate than a dry suit-type zipper, yet appears to be, for all the intents and purposes of a deck bag, just as waterproof.

No matter how hard or at what angle I squirted it, the contents remained dry. Same with the dunk test and while paddling. However, you must make absolutely certain that the lips are sealed along their entire length, or leakage is inevitable.

Watershed lists the volume of the Aleutian as four gallons-an amusing choice of measurement for something that’s supposed to be waterproof-or 989 cubic inches.

That’s a useful size; however, the Aleutian is built in a flat, envelope configuration, and there are no stiffeners to hold it open, so access is not the best. Also, my sample was a deep black color, so the interior was very dark (and hot), making it difficult to see the contents. I’d suggest buying a lighter color.

The bag has a clear chart window on top, underneath which is a pocket where a chart can be inserted; the chart is inside the bag so it always stays dry and in place.

The window is made from tough and highly UV-resistant urethane rather than PVC; nevertheless, it’s surely not as puncture-resistant as the main body and must be considered the weak point. If this were changed to a separate chart case on top of the bag, overall integrity would improve and you could remove the case to get a better look at the chart. [Editor’s note: After the bag was returned by the reviewer, we found that the flap that supports the chart hangs down into the bag. The flap tore easily when pushing gear into the bag.]

A mesh water bottle pocket is on the left exterior; on the right is a very secure holder for a standard cylindrical bilge pump. Finally, the front of the bag is bound with reflective tape that shows up well at night.

Mounting the Watershed bag revealed some deficiencies in the design. First, it’s a wide bag, so its mounting straps could barely be shortened enough to fit on the deck of a 22-inch-wide kayak. More importantly, with the straps pulled tight, it’s impossible to open the bag wide enough to put anything three-dimensional inside.

You have to leave the straps very loose to insert a camera. If the straps were welded to the bag somewhat underneath instead of right at the sides (or if the bag were built with an arched top panel), this problem would disappear. Also, the included strap hooks appear to be designed to clip over the deck bungies, a poor choice of attachment in my opinion. I would replace the hooks with narrower versions that would clip to the deck eyelets, or just tie short nylon cord loops through the eyelets and clip to those.

The Watershed Aleutian has a lot of thoughtful features. It could use a tweak to the mounting system or shape, and perhaps a removable stiffener to ease access.

Price: $110

Voyageur’s Half Dome

The Half Dome incorporates a polyethylene sheet stiffener that gives it a rounded profile-and makes accessing the contents a cinch. The bag is made from PVC-coated polyester in a simple, tapered shape, with no external pockets, save a mesh one at the rear big enough for sunscreen or a small water bottle. The bungies running across the top will secure (not very well) a chart in a ziplock.

The Half Dome utilizes a serious dry suit-type zipper closure that arcs over the rear end of the bag. When it’s open you can pull the rear flap down and easily see and retrieve everything inside the 900-cubic-inch bag. As I expected, there was no leakage under any circumstances. As with all examples of this type of zipper, however, it is quite stiff to operate. This is somewhat reassuring, since you know when the thing is closed, unlike on, say, the Watershed where you have to feel all along the edge of the lips to make sure you’ve popped every bit shut. But the zipper requires a strong pull, which would be much easier if Voyageur added loops at either end of the opening to hook a thumb through while pulling with the other hand.

The Half Dome has the best wave-shedding profile of the bunch. Although its tapered front more easily scoops up small waves coming along the deck than the bags with bluff fronts, which block them, those waves and even bigger ones usually cascade harmlessly off the back of the Voyageur bag. When bigger waves hit the front of the blunt bags, they tended to splash up in my chest and face more.

The Half Dome’s compact shape and 14-inch width fit well on the deck of nearly any kayak. The mounting kit comprises four web straps with plastic clips on one end (like the Watershed, apparently designed to clip to bungies), and sewn loops on the other. If you slid these loops over the bungies that are laced across the bag, you would have an easily adjustable but pretty elastic bungie-to-bungie mount. However, try as I might I couldn’t disassemble the dang fitting that connects the ends of the bungie on the bag, so I couldn’t slide the loops on, short of cutting the bungie and retying it. If this were my bag, I’d ignore the whole setup, and use nylon cord and clips to tie the bag down by its four stout corner eyelets. I think this would be much sturdier in any case. Even with the corners pulled tight, the arched top makes it easy to insert and retrieve gear.

Overall, there was very little to criticize about the Voyageur bag. I worry a bit about the polyethylene sheet abrading the bag from the inside. I’d like to see reinforcing patches where the corners of the sheet rub. I’d wrap the edges of the sheet with tape or foam, but that’s quibbling. The Half Dome is simple, easy to use, and totally waterproof, at a very reasonable price.
Price: $90 | Voyageur

Cascade Designs’ Aleutian

The Aleutian employs a YKK zipper that appears to be one step down from the heavy duty dry suit integrity of the Half Dome’s version. It’s not as stiff to operate, but could still use a couple of grab loops on the bag to hold on to. It passed all my tests with no leakage whatsoever.

The Aleutian is made from urethane-coated Cordura nylon, with welded seams. The bag is stiffened with a polyethylene sheet into a flattened ovoid shape that uses all of its modest 620 cubic inches efficiently. The zipper arcs over the top of the bag about three inches from the rear, so the back doesn’t fold down like a flap-you have to just push down on it to access the inside. Still, it works fine, and there’s a fabric flap that covers the zipper to help keep out grit. The bag is tall enough to hold my SLR camera (if I leave off the motor drive), and wide enough for a couple of extra lenses, plus a field guide and snacks-in other words, it has all the room you’re likely to need. Yet at only 12 1/2 inches wide (compared to 20 for the Watershed, including the clips), it’s compact enough to fit any deck.

The mounting system of the Aleutian consists of two fat Velcro strips across the bottom, which you slide under your deck bungies. It’s not very stable this way; however, when I tied non-elastic nylon cord in an X between my deck fittings and fastened the strip under those, the bag didn’t move around as much. It has the advantage of adapting easily to various deck layouts, but I still wish the bag had D-rings at the corners so you could make your own more rigid attachment system.The Aleutian has no frills aside from bungies and a pair of clips on top to secure your chart case or small items.

In short, the Cascade Designs Aleutian is a versatile and efficiently sized deck bag that will fit a wide variety of boats, including narrow Greenland styles.
Price: $120 | Cascade Designs

Seattle Sports’ Sea Kayak Deck Bag

The Seattle Sports bag is a monster at 1200 cubic inches, yet at 15 inches in overall width it will still fit on most decks. This bag held all my normal deck bag stuff, plus a one-liter water bottle, and still had room for my Gore-Tex shell when the morning turned warm. A stiffening sheet maintains the bag’s shape (and, as with most of these bags, is removable if you don’t want it).
I did not, however, put unprotected cameras inside. The Seattle Sports bag uses a YKK “Hydro-Kiss” weatherproof zipper which will fend off minor splashes and light rain, but is not waterproof. There was about a tablespoon of water inside after both hosing and dunking-although, to be fair, after a paddle in bouncy conditions the inside was quite dry. Still, this product is not intended to be waterproof. The fabric on the bag is a strong, urethane-coated, 400-denier nylon with welded seams, so no water is likely to get in that way.

This bag’s attachment system was the simplest and most adaptable. Nylon straps near each corner can be looped around bungies or through deck eyelets, or be substituted with your own hardware.

Given its large size but low profile, and versatile mounting system, the Seattle Sports bag would also be useful as a behind-the-cockpit bag for items such as outerwear, hats, and gloves, which you’d like to keep mostly dry but which won’t be harmed by a little water.
Price: $60 | Seattle Sports

Salamander’s Sea Kayak Deck Bag

With a zipper similar to that used on the Seattle Sports bag, the Salamander bag was similarly water resistant. PVC-coated nylon keeps the body of the bag waterproof, so only direct splashing or steady rain (or, of course, immersion) results in water inside. As with the Seattle Sports model, the inside of the Salamander bag stayed dry during what I’d call a fair-weather paddle-light breezes and small waves. I could have had a field guide inside with no worries. But when subjected to direct spraying or dunking the zipper leaked a small amount of water almost immediately, mostly through the small gap visible at the end of the zipper track.

For its extra $25, the Salamander bag adds some nice touches compared to the unadorned Seattle Sports model: There’s a zippered mesh pouch on the back and an excellent chart case on top, secured with turn buttons. It’s a matter of a second or two to remove the case to get a better look at your chart.

A (non-removable) polyethylene sheet holds the shape of the deck bag, and the zipper is near the back so the opening flaps down out of your way. Salamander didn’t have a figure for volume, but by my own rough measurements it appears to be similar in size to the Voyageur bag-around 900 cubic inches. Overall width is 13 inches, so fit shouldn’t be a problem on most boats.

Mounting the Salamander bag is straightforward, using four nylon straps that radiate from a reinforced patch on the bottom; they should adapt to almost any kayak deck arrangement.

On my own 22″-wide boat I was able to loop the straps through short lengths of cord tied through my deck eyelets, and the result was very rigid, although waves do get under the bag and flop it around somewhat. This bottom mounting system can’t constrict access to the contents like the Watershed mount. There was a lot to like about the Salamander, as long as you keep its design limits in mind when you load it.
Price: $84.50 | Salamander Paddle Gear

The idea of semi-waterproof deck bag models initially seemed strange to me, but they do eliminate the dampness common with cheaper deck bags. While I’ll probably continue to put my faith in that single layer between the sea and a short circuit, there’s no doubt that even the semi-waterproof models add significant protection to any bagged item inside.

Eskimo Rescue

The paddle bridge requires the kayaks to be nearly parallel and just far enough apart to rotate the victim up between the kayaks.

Several articles have appeared recently on the subject of capsize rescue technique. My concern is that the wet exit and reentry method has become widely accepted in training programs as a first option for rescues. It should be the last thing to try, because it puts a capsize victim and others at unnecessary risk. I recall having written decades ago about the lessons that we might learn from traditional kayakers who developed rescue methods that have stood the test of time:

In rescue, especially at sea or in lakes, the kayak should never be abandoned and need not be if all members of a group know Eskimo rescue methods. Cold water quickly saps the strength of even expert swimmers, and the time spent in practicing climbing back in a kayak would be far better spent in Eskimo rescue practice. (“The Kayak of the Eskimo,” American White Water, August 1961)

It is sad to realize that in the thirty-six years since this article appeared, several kayakers have been born, lived their entire lives and died after making wet exits. They might still be alive if they had known Eskimo rescue technique. My impression from reading accident reports is that most capsize fatalities occur after the victim makes a wet exit.

George Gronseth, who has authored many of Sea Kayaker’s accident reports, estimated that only a very small percentage-say, one or two percent of the victims in fatal capsize accidents-are found inside their kayaks. The rest are found in the water, or missing. Those found in their kayaks probably panicked or, in at least one case, caught their footwear inside the kayak.

Panic can result in a fatal accident, regardless of whether one is in or out of a kayak. I believe the most important obstacle to overcome in kayak training is the fear of being upside-down underwater. The trauma of a capsize begins with the shock of sudden immersion.

Then there is the discomfort caused by hanging head down in the water. Water pressure on the nostrils is hardly noticed when swimming underwater, but it can be painful when upside-down. There is also the fear of entrapment that makes us want to get out of the kayak immediately, while we still have enough air to reach the surface. If we can control the fear that makes us want to bail out, we can find better ways to survive than wet exits.

The subject of avoiding wet exits was addressed in an article entitled “Please Remain Seated,” Sea Kayaker, summer 1990. It described various float and snorkel arrangements that would permit a capsized kayaker to remain in a kayak to roll up or part way up in order to breathe and avoid panic until he or she could be reached for an Eskimo rescue.

How paddlers adjust to underwater activity is greatly influenced by the type of training they receive. As an extreme example of the type of discipline needed underwater, consider that required in military special forces training.

The August 1996 issue of Life magazine contains photographs that should inspire all sea kayakers to learn how to control fear underwater. It shows U.S. Navy Seals training in a swimming pool. To qualify as Seals, they must tread water for ten minutes before retrieving their masks from the pool’s bottom with their teeth. But, they must do all of this with their hands bound behind their back and their feet tied together!

Fortunately, most of us do not have to qualify as Navy Seals. There is a much easier way for a kayaker to learn to control fear underwater. In 1985 and again in 1992, I attended kayak training classes in Greenland.

Before Greenlanders are taught to roll, they put on their kayak jackets, which are fastened around the cockpit, wrists and face. Then, without a paddle, they lean forward with their faces near their decks, wrapping their arms around the sides of their kayaks so that their hands are on the bottoms. Keeping the face near the deck makes the kayak easier to roll and reduces water pressure on the nostrils.

The instructor, wearing boots or chest waders, stands at the bow of the kayak, grasping it, with one hand at the pointed bow and the other at the forefoot, or forward end of the keelson, so he can turn it over and right it again. When the student says he or she is ready, the instructor turns the kayak upside-down. After a few seconds, the student drums his fingers on the bottom of the kayak and is immediately righted by the instructor.

The simple lesson here is that the student, who is in complete control of how long he or she wishes to remain under water, develops confidence. The time that panic-control training buys can be used to drum loudly against the bottom and sides of the kayak while moving the hands vigorously to attract attention. By dog paddling to the surface occasionally, the victim can get a quick breath of air, then duck under to conserve strength while holding both hands up and waving them along the sides of the kayak.

If no help is nearby, the victim has a time-tested Eskimo rescue method available, even though no paddle is at hand. This is a roll that uses the buoyancy of a float.

The Avataq Roll

The Greenland hunting float, or avataq, is carried on the afterdeck. One end of the harpoon line is attached to the seal skin float, so that it can be thrown overboard to act as a drogue for a harpooned seal. In an emergency, it can be used for rolling up if the paddle is lost. A fully inflated paddle float can be carried on the afterdeck and used as a substitute for the avataq.

To roll up on the right side, hold one end of the float in the left hand beside the right knee. Hold the other end of the float in your right hand beside your right hip. Keep a lengthwise tension between the hands as if expanding an accordion. To initiate recovery, pull down toward the face sharply with the left hand, leaning aft as the float clears the front of your torso, then lean forward as you become upright.

At the finish, the left hand will be beside the left hip, and the right hand will be beside the left knee, in a mirror image of the starting position. The hips and trailing knee must rotate the kayak as you roll, and you must coordinate the torso movement so as not to lean forward too quickly. Extend the float outward if more lift is needed for the recovery.

Try practicing this at home on the floor until the movement becomes automatic. Holding a pillow to simulate a float, pretend you are upside-down, and move the pillow from your right side to your left to learn the start and finish positions. Without releasing your grip on the pillow, try a “roll” in the opposite direction by reversing the hand movement.

Bow Rescue The simplest of assisted rescues is for the capsize victim to grab the bow or stern of a nearby kayak to pull himself or herself upright. The reason for grabbing the end of the rescuer’s kayak instead of the middle is to avoid capsizing the rescuer. It is preferable to use the bow so that the victim is in full view of the rescuer.

If the victim paddles to the surface for a breath and sees another kayak parallel to his or hers, but out of reach, he can move toward the rescuer’s kayak by dog paddling to the side while still inside the kayak. This might be the quickest way to reach a nearby kayak if it is pointed the wrong way to be easily maneuvered toward the victim.

With the victim still in his kayak, the rescuer can administer CPR from a sitting position.

It’s also better for the rescuer’s kayak to be parallel to that of the victim to prevent a collision, and allow the rescuer to grasp the bow or stern of the victim’s kayak. By holding the bow and bridging his or her paddle across both kayaks, the rescuer’s bow is automatically at or near the victim’s hand. Another advantage is that the rescuer can keep the bow from swinging out of reach during the rescue by moving the lower body.

This method was popular at Ammassalik, East Greenland, in the early 1930s, when two Gino Watkins expeditions were there. The book Northern Lights illustrates this rescue. It is also shown in motion pictures made during the Watkins expeditions.

When used at roll practice, the instructor can be in alignment for a parallel bow rescue, yet well out of the way so that paddling alongside can be done within seconds if a student signals for help. When traveling in a group, an experienced kayaker can follow behind and slightly to one side of a paddler who is more likely to capsize. This same applies to other rescues performed with the kayaks parallel to each other. Being in the right formation, especially when making wide crossings, can save much time in an emergency.

The Paddle Bridge Rescue

The bow rescue requires that the victim is able to grasp a bow and pull himself or herself up. A capsize victim who is exhausted or unconscious can still be rescued by one kayaker. If an unconscious victim and rescuer are facing, it is even possible to reach underwater and pull the victim’s head up and across the foredeck of the rescuing kayak. This position makes mouth-to-mouth resuscitation possible without unsealing the spray apron of either kayak.

The paddle bridge requires the kayaks to be nearly parallel and just far enough apart to rotate the victim up between the kayaks. The rescuer makes sure that the paddle is firmly across both kayaks with allowance for the victim’s kayak to roll under the paddle.

The rescuer then uses one hand to hold the paddle as a bridge across both kayaks while keeping the other hand free to assist the victim. An illustration and description of the paddle bridge rescue appeared in Fridtjof Nansen’s book, Eskimo Life, published in 1891. It and the other rescues described here probably evolved over many centuries.

Storm Rescue

In stormy seas, a paddle placed as a bridge across two kayaks could slip out of position and cause the rescuer to capsize, so it is more secure if the rescuer pulls alongside so that the two kayaks touch. Then, extending his or her paddle farther across both kayaks, the rescuer reaches across the victim’s kayak to grasp the far gunwale.

Once the kayaks are securely held together, the rescuer can extend his or her paddle farther across the victim’s kayak to reach the opposite side. Thus the paddle is across the foredeck of the rescuer’s kayak and cantilevered beyond the opposite side of the victim’s kayak. Then the victim can chin up on the outboard side of the catamaran formed by the two kayaks. As the victim rolls up, the rescuer allows the victim’s kayak to rotate under the paddle bridge.

In the storm rescue, the victim can help keep the kayaks together in rough seas by chinning up on the rescuer’s extended paddle from the outside.

An advantage of this rescue is that the victim helps keep the kayaks together as he or she rolls up. A disadvantage is that the kayaks bump together as the capsized one is righted, which might cause hull damage to the kayaks or minor injury to either kayaker. In an emergency, this risk is insignificant, but care should be exercised in practice.

This rescue should only be used with strong paddles, because there is greater bending load on the cantilevered paddle than there is in a paddle bridge, which supports the paddle at each end. In practicing this maneuver, the rescuer should relax pressure on the paddle at the first sign of excessive bending.

“T” Rescue

If the rescuer’s kayak is not in position for a parallel rescue, but the victim’s bow can be reached, the rescuer can pull the bow of the victim’s kayak across his or her foredeck, and twist the capsized kayak so the victim can at least get far enough upright to breathe and rest while awaiting further help. It is important for the victim to lean forward and wrap his arms around the kayak to make it easier for the rescuer to rotate it upright.

The Greenland “T” rescue enables a capsize victim to breath and avoid panic until further help can be given.There are also Eskimo rescues for extreme situations, where a kayaker might get out of the kayak and have to be carried piggyback on someone’s afterdeck. This is extremely dangerous in cold water. There was a poignant story told by Dr. Alfred Bertelsen, a medical researcher in Greenland around 1900. Three brothers were out hunting in kayaks when one of them capsized. He exited his kayak after failing to roll up. His brothers managed to get him up between them, but he froze to death in their arms.

These half dozen rescues will see a group of kayakers through many emergency situations. It is crucial to have practiced them as a team before an emergency develops. Each person should take turns being the rescuer and the victim. It is prudent to practice these rescues under varying sea conditions.

Rescue in Alaska A rising wind overpowers two visiting kayakers

I had been thinking about paddling in Alaska for a long time. Many kayakers I know have paddled there, most of them in organized groups, and almost all of them in Prince William Sound. My friend and fellow kayaker, Albert, instantly accepted the idea of paddling in Alaska, but proposed a different Alaskan destination, the Kenai Fjords.

We both are committed kayakers. I’d been kayaking for six years year-round, along the Mediterranean coasts of Tel Aviv and Herzlia. I made a few kayak trips in Greece, visited Wales during summer and winter for the intense BCU Five-star training, and joined the three-man Ireland expedition, paddling 400 miles clockwise from Dublin to Galway. I feel quite comfortable in tidal races and in surf zone and have a good roll.

Albert had been paddling for four years. He has never taken serious advanced kayak training; he can roll but his roll is weak. He has done a couple of kayak trips in Greece and paddled for two weeks in Alaska with a strong group, both in Prince William Sound and in the open sea.

Our plan was to explore the Kenai Fjords launching in Seward, rounding the Kenai Peninsula and taking out after roughly 300 miles at Homer.

FIRST EIGHT DAYS

On the bus from Anchorage to Seward, our driver updated us on the weather situation: “We’ve had a very dry summer this year, very unusual, but now, at last, we’re getting the first real rain.” We could see the dark clouds from the bus window.

At Seward it was already raining heavily and we were informed that the wind outside Resurrection Bay was southeast at 45 knots. Alan, the local kayaker who helped us with the kayaks, commented on that: “You wouldn’t believe what beautiful weather we’ve had all this summer, but we always knew that when the storm would come, it would come big.” We decided that even in this weather we could start our trip if we kept to the sheltered water inside the fjords and bays. We left on the next day, knowing that we would stay in Resurrection Bay, until the conditions improved.

We were paddling rented NDK Explorers, the same model that both of us own and paddle at home. Both of us carried NOAA nautical charts of the area on our kayak decks. We each had a compass mounted on our kayak fore decks. Albert carried a simple waterproof Magellan GPS in his day hatch. He carried a backup GPS, this one a Garmin, packed below deck.

I had an Icon waterproof marine radio, kept in a waterproof bag that was attached to my deck. I also had a Macmurdo PLB (Personal Locator Beacon) with GPS in a pocket on the back of my PFD. In a dry bag deep in my day hatch, I had two aerial flash rockets.

While on the water we both wore drysuits with one layer of fleece and a hat. Each of us used a paddle leash and had a spare paddle on deck.

The constant rain stayed with us for the next eight days, usually accompanied by wind and fog. We continued our trip, cautiously passing from one fjord to another, always having escape plans ready and usually using them. On one occasion we had high and rising choppy seas and strong wind just before the narrow McArthur passage, but we found shelter safely in Chance Cove that was one of a few escape places that we prepared for that day.

On another occasion we were surprised by the enormous strength of the tidal race at the entrance of the Northwestern Fjord—it was clearly impassable so we camped on the western side of the upper Harris Bay. It was the only place that day without big surf and suitable for landing. We didn’t have a day without a new challenge.

By July 29 we had covered 155 nautical miles and more than half of the distance to Homer.

On that day we camped at Berger Bay on Nuka Island. It was a beautiful gravel beach with a place for the tent and a natural place for our kitchen. We had a fresh salmon that I caught and it was our first camp almost without rain. What else does a kayaker need?

THE PLAN FOR THE DAY

We knew that Gore Point is often a difficult place. It has high cliffs, unpredictable currents and rocks all around. But Gore Point was not our main concern. We worried more about the day following our rounding of the point. On that day we would have to leave very early to catch the flood. It was the only way to continue west from Gore Peninsula and cover the long distance to reach the first landing spot.

To set ourselves up properly for the following day our objective was to pass Gore Point as quickly as possible and to camp at the first place that presented itself. We knew of one potential campsite, Ranger Beach, located on the west side of the base of the Gore Peninsula. It is a sandy beach and the landing should not be a problem with the usual SW winds. Ranger Beach was located 15 miles from our camping site on Nuka Island.

At that point in the trip we were in good shape and could easily paddle at 4 knots, so the entire way with the favorable wind and current should take less than five hours. That was the good news. The bad news was that the last 11 miles, everything west of Tonsina Bay, offered absolutely no place to land. It is all high cliffs and we knew very well from the previous days that even in a moderate swell we would do well to stay at least one mile away from the land. We hardly had any rain that evening and our weather forecast, for a change, was not bad.

The last forecast that we got by satellite-phone text message from our weather support man in Israel was for wind ESE at Beaufort Force 3 to 5, and waves at one to two meters coming from SSW. The VHF reception was very bad at our campsite, but from what we were able to make out seemed to be a forecast that was no different from our satellite-phone forecast. Before we retreated to our tent that night we watched the northern lights on the horizon. We felt encouraged by our prospects for the following day.

THE GORE POINT DAY

We left our camp on Nuka Island at 1 P.M. The sea was very quiet and there was almost no wind. It was foggy but not too bad; the visibility was about two miles. We decided to go in the same manner as we did on the previous days—keeping within sight of land. It made navigation easy and we could quickly determine our location based on the shoreline shape and the mountain relief. We headed west and then southwest to Tonsina Bay.

Very soon after we left, we started to feel some wind. It was NNE at Beaufort Force 3 to 4. This direction was unusual and not the forecast. The wind was, however, ideal for us, and I had nothing to complain about having it help push us along. In about one hour we could see Tonsina Bay on our right side. Our speed was very good, the weather was great and we continued south to Front Point.

On our way to Front Point the wind changed to northeast but still was at Beaufort Force 4. There were only the occasional whitecaps. The only thing that worried us was that the fog was becoming worse. We could still see the land from about one mile’s distance, but it was behind a hardly transparent screen of fog. We worried that our view of the land could disappear in a few minutes. But the sea conditions were not bad at all at Front Point and we continued to Gore Bight.

The three miles from Front Point to Gore Bight took about one hour and within that span of time everything changed. The wind grew stronger with frightening persistence. In one hour the wind had changed from a friendly Force 4 to a challenging Force 7. The direction of the wind changed as well, shifting from northeast to east.

At 3:30 P.M. we were two miles northeast of Gore Point in a rapidly strengthening wind and in waves reaching eight feet and coming from all directions. We still could see some shape of the land to the north, but the fog obscured any hint of the Gore Peninsula. (The log kept by the captain aboard the nearby fishing vessel Vigilant noted “15:30 … Gore Point, Winds 45 miles per hour, Seas 10 Feet.”)

I had to brace constantly just to stay upright. Albert was much less experienced in a sea like this, and I knew his situation had to be much worse. We were pushed by the wind toward the most intimidating place on the whole Kenai Peninsula. The locals know it as the best location to find interesting debris that has been driven ashore by wind and waves.

It was absolutely clear to me that we were in serious trouble. I called out to Albert, “I think we should call for help.” He quickly agreed.

We brought our kayaks alongside one another. Albert held my cockpit with both hands and I took the VHF radio from my deck and attached it by the wrist strap to the clips in my PFD’s right pocket. Then I switched the VHF on, put it on Channel 16 and pressed the transmit button.

“MAYDAY, MAYDAY, MAYDAY. We are two kayakers two miles northeast of Gore Point. We are still in the kayaks but cannot paddle and we are drifting in the strong wind.”

I had very little hope that anyone would receive our message as we hadn’t seen any other boats since we left Aialik Bay five days ago. We hadn’t seen anyone onshore either. To my surprise, the call was answered. The blowing wind and the fact that English is not one of my native languages didn’t help. I could understand only part of what came across the radio. I heard: “This is … Star, … specify your position.” I didn’t know who had responded to my call. I replied “Please wait.”

In the strong wind and high waves Albert and I concentrated on keeping the kayaks rafted together. I put the VHF into my pocket, then held Albert’s cockpit while he retrieved the GPS from his day hatch. We couldn’t make any mistakes. He switched the GPS on and held my cockpit as the coordinates appeared on the GPS screen.

I took the VHF out and relayed our coordinates using numbers as well as the words “degrees, minutes, seconds, north, west.” (It was explained to me later that I was expected to use only digits, everything else only made the reception more difficult.) The VHF came back: “… sending the boat … will come in one hour and fifteen minutes. It is a big black boat; you will see it.” I was not so sure that we would see it in the fog. The hour we would have to wait seemed like a very long time, too long a time.

I looked at Albert: “Let’s activate the PLB.” Albert took the PLB out of the pocket on the back of my PFD, and opened the safety. “The lights are on,” said Albert.

We were so focused on operating our electronics that we didn’t look around even though we knew we were drifting. Albert glanced up, “Gadi, look!”

I looked and saw the landscape looming over the fog. The land wasn’t the coast we’d been seeing to the north. It was to the west. It was the Gore Peninsula.

We were drifting very fast in a very bad direction. There was very little chance we would survive being washed ashore on the peninsula. The only solution was to paddle away very fast. We needed to move about one mile south, to avoid getting washed ashore.

I called on the VHF: “This is the two kayaks; we will try to paddle south and get around Gore Point.”

We started to paddle again, bearing ESE to make sure our real progress was to the south. Our effort was mostly against the wind now, and it helped our stability to have the waves coming over the bow.

But the farther south we moved, the worse the sea conditions became. It wasn’t surprising. The sea around the end of a headland is always the worst.

It is hard to say how much time passed, but at some point we had the Gore Peninsula behind us. Now, without the danger of being thrown on the rocks, we could try to go to the peninsula’s west side where we would probably be protected from the strong wind and waves. We continued to paddle west, but the sea was the worst we had met that day. The 11-foot waves coming from the SSE were constantly breaking in the strong east wind. One cresting wave hit me from the left and turned me over. The water wasn’t as cold as I expected. I noticed it wasn’t as salty to my tongue as the Mediterranean; I felt like I was turned over on a river.

My roll is quite reliable, but when I was nearly upright, another blow turned me over once again. I made a much more aggressive attempt and came up expressing my feelings in my native Russian language. I realized that if the waves could capsize me, they could do the same to Albert, and he probably wouldn’t be able to recover by rolling. Albert was on my left and I reduced the distance between us to about 30 feet. In a few minutes one wave crushed violently on both of us.

I did a high brace and survived. Then I looked to my left after the wave passed and saw the white bottom of Albert’s kayak. Albert had bailed out and was holding onto a deck line. The strong wind made it difficult to maneuver alongside him, but I eventually reached his kayak. I didn’t dare try to empty the kayak, so I just made the rescue and got Albert back into a cockpit full of water. We had a hand pump on my deck and I hoped to use it to empty the cockpit. We rafted up and started to pump. Our success was only partial. We took some water out but the process was very slow, and we had to protect the cockpit from the waves.

I asked Albert if he thought we should try to paddle toward land. He said that he preferred to stay rafted together and wait for rescue. It was quite understandable. The water remaining in his cockpit made his kayak less stable. The wave that had capsized Albert had washed away his hat and glasses, despite the fact that they were tethered.

Albert’s glasses are a very strong prescription and he had never even tried to paddle without them. I looked around and couldn’t see any hint of the land—the fog was obviously stronger than before and, besides that, at the time of the rescue we were drifting out. I looked on the GPS—it was dead, just a black screen. I agreed that the best thing right now was to keep our raft upright and to wait for the rescue.

As we were moving away from Gore Point, the wind remained strong but the seas became more regular. The waves were still big, but now they came from only one direction. A strong rain had started, making the visibility even worse.

We couldn’t put our paddles at 90 degrees to the kayaks. The wind was shaking our raft structure and threatened to take our paddles away. So we had no other choice but to put the paddles under the deck lines. They were not so vulnerable to the wind there, but they were not in the best start position for us if we failed to keep the kayaks rafted and needed the paddles to roll.

We had to pay attention to every wave. It was all about having the right angle of the kayak to meet the wave. All the waves came from Albert’s side. My left hand was on Albert’s kayak and on each wave I pushed the far side of his kayak down. It was a kind of low brace edging without a paddle that gave us some control of our stability. While we were rafted up we maintained contact with rescuers over the VHF.

“This is two kayaks; we are drifting in strong wind.”

Rescue Ship: “Do you see any land around?”

“Negative, we are in fog; we don’t see any land.”

I later learned that the captain of the rescue ship was not confident that we had actually succeeded in getting beyond Gore Point and was searching for us in the worst place, on the east side of the point. This is why the question about land was asked more than once.

“We activated our PLB. Do you have our position?”

No answer. Some time after, the rescue ship responded: “We turned on our searchlights. Do you see us?”

“Negative, we see nothing. We activated our PLB; do you have our position?”

Rescue ship: “Do you have any flares?”

Deep inside my day hatch I had a dry bag that we got with the kayaks. I knew that we had flares in there but I didn’t think it was worth the risk for one of us to let go of the deck to open the day compartment and grope for the flares. Even if we had been able to find flares, I didn’t believe that they would have been able to see them when we hadn’t been able to see their searchlights.

I replied on VHF: “Negative, we don’t have flares. We activated our PLB; do you have our position?”

The search by the ship continued quite a long time, but they couldn’t find us. Then we got a new message. “A helicopter is coming for you. It will direct us.”

Then after some time we heard a transmission from the rescue helicopter. It was hard for me to understand every word: “… radio … count … ten …“

What I got was enough. “One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten. Should I do it again?”

Rescue Helicopter: “… count …”

“Should I count again?”

Rescue Helicopter: “Yes, please count.”

“One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten. Should I do it again?”

Rescue Helicopter: “Yes.”

This back and forth continued for some time.

It was explained to me later that I had been asked to count repeatedly to provide a continuous radio transmission.

Rescue Helicopter: “Great! The signal is stronger now!”

In one minute we saw a big red helicopter coming out of the fog just above us. It was a moment that I will never forget.

“We are in good condition. We can wait for the ship.”

A few minutes later the helicopter dispatched a rescue swimmer.

He approached us with a huge smile on his face: “Hi! I’m Chuck.” It seemed he would jump on our kayaks and shake our hands. “How are you?”

“Albert lost his hat and glasses but we are well.”

“What are you doing here?”

“We are paddling nine days from Seward to Homer. The weather changed suddenly.”

“Where you from?”

“We are from Israel.”

“Israel? Really?! You are quite far away!”

In a few minutes we spotted the Vigilant with all of the searchlights on. It was bouncing up and down on the waves and our first attempt to come to the ship with the kayaks didn’t go well.

But Chuck was very cool and very efficient. We were told to leave the kayaks and climb up using the ship’s tethered life ring. The ship’s crew pulled us aboard. Chuck held on to our kayaks and helped the Vigilant crew haul our boats aboard. In short time we were safely aboard with all of our gear.

It was 6:00 P.M. Two and half hours had passed from the moment we had transmitted our first Mayday.

The fishing boat Vigilant, a 58-foot fish tender, was handled by captain Dennis Magnuson and the deckhand Quinn Tavfer. We couldn’t imagine a better welcome than what we got on the Vigilant. Fortunately for us, the Vigilant had been nearby in Port Dick Bay collecting salmon from three smaller fishing vessels. We stayed aboard the ship for two days, and when it was full of salmon and ready to head home, we were dropped off at Homer.

LESSONS LEARNED

BE ALERT

We allowed ourselves to be distracted from our safety procedures. Our routine was to get a weather forecast via the satellite phone text message, and listen to the weather radio twice a day to get the regular updates at 4 A.M. and 4 P.M. Even when we didn’t have reception for the weather radio at our campsite, we still could paddle out from shore and probably have reception out on the water.

With the good weather around us, the forecast for fair weather we had gotten a day before and the general feeling that conditions would likely improve after the eight days of rain we’d been through, blunted our senses, and we didn’t maintain the necessary level of alertness. The radio forecast was drastically changed that day.

If we had received it, we would have heard the gale warning. We did ultimately receive the SMS message announcing the change in the weather forecast, but it was received by our satellite phone—when we were already on the fishing boat—after a delay of more than twelve hours.

BE WELL EQUIPPED

Both the PLB and waterproof VHF radio were necessary. If we had had only the PLB and not the VHF, we would have had no knowledge about a rescue being launched until it got to us. At least two hours could have passed while we waited and wondered. I can say that it would have been highly unpleasant.

According to the Coast Guard, the location of a transmitting 406 PLB beacon like we had can be determined within approximately three miles by the first satellite pass, and to within one mile after three satellite passes. In our case of very poor visibility and fast drifting in the wind, it would be very difficult not only for ships but also for the Coast Guard helicopter to find us without the radio signal.

The fact that our VHF radio call was heard by the fishermen was just good luck. The annual salmon season in Port Dick Bay lasts only twenty days in a year. Without large vessels around, our PLB would have been the only means to call for help.

We had flares, but they were stowed deep in the day hatch. In the fog they might not have done much good but, as a rule, safety flares should be kept handy and ready for use.

A Rocky Rescue – a Deceptively Gentle Swell Puts a Bay Area Kayaker in a Tight Spot.

I enjoy kayaking in the rocks outside San Francisco’s Golden Gate, so I was happy to see a post from Bill Vonnegut about paddling north from Rodeo Beach. When hearing there might be a lot of paddlers from our club (Bay Area Sea Kayakers, BASK) for this outing, I was delighted at the chance to kayak with some folks I might not have seen in a while.

I even thought the large group might afford the opportunity for a little rescue practice. Ultimately there were about 22 people on this trip. Another smaller contingent with another four to six BASK kayakers started shortly after our group.

We paddled off the beach into 3- to 4-foot waves. Most of the waves we encountered after leaving the shore were much smaller. On this relatively benign day we headed north up the coast, much closer to the rocks than is typically possible for the area.

With this sort of club trip it is not likely, nor necessarily even desirable, for everyone to stay in one large pod, so it wasn’t long before we were in groups of about four to six people.

We stopped to play in the passages into caves and through arches and we rode waves through slots between rocks or over them. Groups split apart, swapped members and merged into new groups.

That there was not a single paddler that day who lacked the skills or experience to be out there made this an easy affair. There were capsizes with and without wet exits, as well as a few simple rescues throughout the day, but we were all having a great time.

Ciaran:

It was a nice day with very little wind and maybe-two foot swells. Usually they’re bigger than this. Shortly into the paddle, Tony Johnson and I negotiated a small pour-over at the same time. I tried to make a hard left turn to avoid Tony.

I went over and rolled back up again. No big deal. I hit the pour-over a few more times, and, I have to say, I was having fun. Then I got hung up on a rock and went over again. My bow got stuck on a rock and I blew my first two roll attempts. As I was setting up for a bomb-proof roll, I saw someone’s bow next to my boat so I did a bow rescue instead. Conditions seemed very calm and my guard was probably down a bit.

I paddled back outside and someone asked, “How many times have you been over already?” I said, “two,” and thought to myself, this is going to be a long day—possibly a 14 mile paddle—and I should probably dial it down a bit.

Gregg:

Because of my penchant for play and exploring, I tend to find myself taking up the rear in the group on any rock-garden trip. As I rounded one bend, a large arch came into view. There was a large group of people sitting a bit outside the arch. It seemed as if folks were just casually chatting, but then I heard someone say something about someone getting flushed from “there.”

I didn’t know where “there” was, but then I saw Ciaran abruptly appear, flushed from a cleft in the rock. He was out of his boat and hanging onto a toggle. Just as suddenly as he appeared, Ciaran and his boat were sucked back into the crevice. Several of us started shouting at Ciaran to let go of his boat and just swim out. I couldn’t tell whether he could hear anyone or not.

Ciaran:

There was a big arch that some kayakers were playing in and to its right there was a small slot. I was observing the slot for a short time when I saw someone do a little pour-over inside the slot and come out at the front of the arch. I observed a little longer and decided I was going to go for it. So much for my decision to dial it down.

I went into the slot on the next surge but wasn’t fast enough and landed on top of the pour-over. No big deal, I figured, I would just wait for the next wave to carry me through to the front of the arch. The next wave came in but, instead of washing me through to the front of the arch, it sucked me back into the back of the slot.

I completely failed to anticipate this. I went into combat mode. There was a lot of whitewater around me and I went over. I rolled back up, tried to paddle forward in the slot, but it was only three- to four-feet wide. The next surge came in and sent me back even farther and rolled me upside down again. I thought bailing out was not an option and would make things very difficult. It was too narrow to roll but I managed to push off the bottom to right myself. I headed for the exit only to be hit again by the incoming surge and sent back to the back of the slot.

I think I went over again and managed to right myself by climbing up the side wall. There was no room to roll. At that point I was feeling this was becoming a bad situation and attempted to rush for the exit again. The next surge sent me flying backward again. My boat got stuck sideways between the two walls and I was sucked out of the cockpit.

I hadn’t been unintentionally out of my boat in about three years and thought, “This isn’t going to be good.” The water pulled me down and under what seemed to be a ledge underwater. I was held there for what felt like a long time. When the surge subsided, I made for the exit again, grabbing my boat along the way and trying to swim with it and the paddle. I guess this was instinct—“never lose your boat or your paddle.”

After the surge came in and out a couple more times, I could no longer hold onto my boat so I let it go. The boat came back and forth, crashing into me a bunch of times so I held onto it again. I even thought, “If I hold onto the boat, I might get washed out to the exit with it.” At one point I tried to climb on top of the boat, but that didn’t help any. I was held under the ledge for about twenty seconds at a time, and drank a lot of water.

Gregg:

Though the outside swell didn’t rise above 3–4 feet, the effect was amplified in the tight confines of the slot, causing the water to slosh in all directions at once, creating standing waves in a clapotis effect.

Given the way the water was sucking in and out of there, creating lots of strong currents and whirls and alternately exposing the mussel-encrusted rock or pounding it with whitewater, it seemed debatable as to whether another boat in there would make the situation better or worse.

Jeff, a Class-V whitewater boater, paddled his whitewater boat into the melee and attempted to rescue Ciaran. He left me with the bag end of his tow rope but I very quickly had to let go as it was not long enough, and my holding onto it was preventing Jeff from paddling in.

Even with a slack rescue line Jeff still went in. By this time Ciaran, despite having on his PFD, was repeatedly disappearing beneath the waves. He would only be gone for a few seconds, but those seconds seemed to stretch out when he would not immediately pop to the surface.

Ciaran:

After about ten minutes in the slot I was feeling fatigued. Jeff Hastings came in with his small blue riverboat and tried to extract me. We both got bashed around back and forth in the surge. Jeff rolled at least once but, no matter what, I couldn’t seem to hold onto his boat.

Jeff is a very strong kayaker and, at first, I really thought he was going to drag me out of there. He also inspired me to keeping fighting. He told me to let my boat go which I think I did but was concerned about it hitting me again. I felt like a pin in a bowling alley.

Someone threw in a throw rope which I grabbed and started to reel in. After I reeled in about 50 feet, I realized there was no tension on the other end. So I let it go. The next surge wrapped the rope around my body and legs, which I managed to brush off. I ended up in the back of the slot again, under the ledge.

Gregg:

Jeff reached underwater a few times to pull Ciaran to the surface. Unfortunately Jeff was getting banged around pretty hard as well and was over a few times, but he always managed to roll up. Once when the area was sucked partially dry by the incoming swelI, I saw Jeff’s boat wedged upside down between two rocks inside the crevice. It’s a testament to his skill that he didn’t end up out of his boat himself.

Still, despite all Jeff’s efforts, Ciaran never had the strength to hold on when Jeff would attempt to extricate him. And the longer Jeff’s boat was being tossed around in there, the greater the chances of injury to Ciaran and the chances of him becoming a victim himself. Ultimately, Jeff was forced to abandon his efforts in the slot.

At some point during all of this, Ciaran’s boat finally got washed out and Bill and others grabbed it and took it out of the way. I could see Ciaran’s expression clearly during one of the times he came to the surface. The look on his face was grim at best.

Ciaran:

Jeff, my boat and the rope were gone. I felt myself being sucked under the rock and let go a bunch of times. I certainly got my money’s worth out of my helmet. It was a pity it did not cover all of me. I felt like I was in a giant toilet lined with rocks and being flushed every ten or fifteen seconds. I had no energy left and could not fight anymore.

I felt I had done 15 rounds with Mike Tyson and was setting up for another 15. I realize now that after all that struggling I was not getting close to the exit at all. First I was angry and then I was accepting of my fate. I was quite sure I would die. I told myself that my wife and kids would be okay and tried to picture them.

It came to a point that I thought I would go under the rock only one — maybe two — more times. And that would be it. I had swallowed a lot of water but still had not inhaled any. For a fleeting moment, I considered inhaling water to bring the inevitable end on quicker. Then I pushed this idea out of my mind. I only hoped it wouldn’t take too long and not hurt too much.

Gregg:

I was desperate to try another tactic and thought about climbing onto the rock outcropping close to the arch. I paddled to the arch side figuring the currents would be easier to deal with there and scouted the options. I hadn’t yet committed to that decision though and went back to check on the progress.

Tony, a very experienced sea kayaker, had been having the same idea but he had committed to his course of action. He told me he was going to jump out of his boat and clamber onto the rock and asked if I would take care of his kayak. I agreed and suggested we do it on the arch side of the rock where I had just been scouting.

Tony, full of adrenaline, was already heading in that direction. He and I paddled to the north side of the rock outcropping. Once there, Tony quickly exited his boat and swam to the rock. I held his boat and tossed him my rescue belt. By this time Jeff had arrived near us.

I think he was also thinking of jumping on the rock. As I was already exiting my boat, Jeff instead helped organize folks to take care of the kayaks after I’d released them to swim to the rock.

When I arrived at the rock, I set my paddle as high up on the rock as I could without it being in the way of the precarious footing available to Tony and me. At some point, I have no clue when, my paddle was washed away by the waves repeatedly washing over the rock.

By this point, Tony had thrown a line into the slot. Fortunately it landed right over Ciaran’s shoulder. He was now wedged toward the back of the crevice and while still splashed by the waves, he was no longer in the water and being battered about.

Ciaran:

After about twenty minutes, I started to hear Tony’s voice and then saw him standing on a rock above and to the left of me — about 20 feet away. I was in a daze at this point. My arms and legs no longer worked. To be honest, I found him a little annoying. I figured these were my last moments and I wanted to be in peace. He was disrupting this.

Tony is a great friend and kayaker and consistently manages to inspire me; he seems to always say the right thing at the right time. I remember him saying, “Be strong, Ciaran.” It is something he says a lot. He kept saying, “Grab the rope, grab the rope.” I made one last attempt, figuring he was not going to go away, so I may as well make an effort.

Gregg:

At this point Ciaran had probably been in the water about 15 minutes. He was hypothermic and physically exhausted from his struggles, had swallowed lots of water, been beaten by the rocks and his own boat, and was now suffering a post-adrenaline-rush crash.

There was no way for him to climb out from his perch, and jumping back into the water was not an option either.

Tony had to very forcefully yell at him to “Stay strong!” while giving him directions about what to do with the rope. Despite the wave noise, Tony heard the click of the carabiner around the rope; he gave the word and Ciaran jumped back into the water.

There were brief moments when the surge pulled him toward us, allowing us to reel in the rope. But it seemed most of the time we were tugging for all we were worth to keep him from being pulled back into the crevice. The opposing forces of the fast moving water rushing like a river in the crevice, and Tony and I struggling against it, caused Ciaran to slide just beneath the surface as the water rushed over him. Seeing that made us more determined to hold on, and we eventually worked him alongside the rock we were standing on.

Ciaran:

It took everything I had to wrap the rope around myself and click the carabiner onto it. The rope tightened around me as Tony pulled me out toward the exit. He tried to pull me up. Then I noticed Gregg Berman standing behind him, also holding the rope.

I saw the next surge coming down and I tried to hold onto the rocks. I don’t know if I was any help. We all nearly ended up in the slot. They pulled me farther and farther toward the exit and then up onto the rocks. Gregg reached out and said, “Take my hand,” which I did. At this point I actually thought for the first time that I might make it. I was completely exhausted.

Gregg:

We were at least ten feet above Ciaran and the rock was too steep to even consider attempting to haul him up the face. From my position, I was able to back up to a lower, though more wave-washed portion of the rock while maintaining my hold on the rope.

Once I was set, we timed it and Tony let go of the rope and I pulled Ciaran, now in a much weaker part of the current, the last few feet to the rock. As he got there, I yelled for him to take my hand and initially got no response despite the fact he was looking right at me. I yelled again and he slowly reached out his hand. It was a struggle for Tony and me to haul him onto the rock and initially he just lay there face down trying to recover.

I was now more afraid that he was going to be washed off the rock, and no matter which direction he was taken, it would not have been good. My language became quite dictatorial as I barked like a drill sergeant that no matter how tired he was, he had to move his butt higher up the rock. While Ciaran attempted to crawl, we hauled him higher onto the rock just before the surge washed over the spot where he had just been lying.

Ciaran:

Tony and Gregg held on to me, asked me questions and tried to get some life back into me. I told Tony, “I have to rest. I can’t move anything.” I had never felt so helpless. I guessed this was what being paralyzed feels like. At least once a wave almost washed us off the rock, so we moved up higher.

Gregg:

As we turned Ciaran over, I noticed how dark purple his face had become. He was conscious and talking, even if totally spent. I quickly checked him over and he eventually was able to sit up.

Ciaran had fought beyond what we might typically be capable of and was completely exhausted. I wanted to get some calories in him before he crashed further. I always keep a few strips of fruit leather or energy bars in my PFD. Initially Ciaran could not eat, though he ultimately managed to slowly get some of the food down his gullet.

Other members of our group were rafting kayaks so Ciaran could be hauled away from the rocks to a landing site. Ciaran was lucid and had some energy coming back and he, Tony, and I decided if we could get his boat on the rocks and get him in it, that would be the best solution. His boat was brought to us and Tony and I held it in place while Ciaran climbed in and took up his spare paddle.

When the swell rose again and the group in the water was ready, we pushed and Ciaran easily slid down the steep rock to the kayakers waiting below to catch him.

Ciaran:

Tony and Gregg pulled the boat up onto the rocks and I managed to climb back in. They snapped on my spray skirt, assembled my spare paddle, and launched me down the rocks into the water. I managed a little brace and stayed upright. It took all I had to stay upright.

Gregg:

Tony and I then moved to the farthest seaward portion of the rock to prepare to reenter our boats. It wasn’t until someone offered me my paddle that I even realized it had been gone. I jumped in the water and paddle-swam to my boat and Tony swam to his.

At this point Elizabeth and a few others were rafted up with Ciaran and supporting him. It was agreed that we would do a rafted tow with another paddler holding on to Ciaran to support him while we headed back to Rodeo Beach. I clipped on and started a tow.

Anders quickly offered to help with an in-line tow and attached to my bow. Tony clipped to Ciaran’s boat as well, so now we had both an in-line and a husky tow on the same boat.

After we’d covered about half the distance back to Rodeo Beach, Ciaran regained enough strength to balance himself without being rafted up with a supporting paddler. With just a single boat in tow, the work was much easier. He still had a kayaker paddling on either side of him though, just in case. By this point he was much more communicative and doing much better. We all even joked about the new feature we would name in his honor, “Ciaran’s Crack.”

We decided to paddle to the southern part of the beach. It was farther from our cars but it had much smaller surf. As we neared the beach, Bill paddled in first to assist with the landing. Before crossing the surf zone we disengaged our tows for the paddle in. Ciaran said that he had lost his contact lenses and could barely see. I jokingly promised him I’d go back and look for them. We didn’t want to risk any more calamity with a collision in the surf so with Bill on the beach to catch Ciaran, I escorted him the last couple hundred feet through the surf zone. We timed it well and had an uneventful landing.

We all headed up to the cars, and as we were getting Ciaran changed into dry clothes, Lynnette, Tony’s wife, appeared. She had been hiking on the bluffs overlooking the coast. When she saw a contingent with Tony’s boat moving “too slowly” back to the beach only a short while after launching, she knew something was amiss and came to meet us.

There had been talk of getting Ciaran to a hospital. Jeff had been worried about the risk of secondary drowning, where your lungs fill with your own body fluids up to 72 hours after a near drowning as they try to clear themselves of any contaminants. There had also been talk of someone driving him home. At this point, however, his breathing was doing great. Despite the large amounts of water he surely swallowed, it seems little entered his lungs, as not once did I notice him cough from the time we pulled him onto the rocks till we got him safely back to the put-in.

With his strength returning, warm clothes, plenty of food, a public place with lots of resources and Lyn and Anders to stay with him, we decided to just let him rest and recover before determining whether he was safe to return home on his own.

The rest of us headed back to the water to reconvene with the rest of the group. Anders stayed there quite a while and Lynnette talked with Ciaran for at least three hours there in the parking lot to help him sort his experience.

Lessons Learned

Gregg:

I had heard of BASK long before moving to California and joined shortly before I moved out here.

BASK provides ample opportunity for a whole host of training sessions, most of which are free or only of minimal cost to members and are run by other members. The club also promotes classes conducted by professional instructors. Each summer we select about a dozen lucky participants to take part in our annual monthlong skills clinic.

You would be hard-pressed to find a more thorough mental and physical course on paddling. On this particular outing, being in a club like BASK gave the group an advantage. Most of the participants were either graduates of, or instructors for the BASK skills clinic. Most had organized or participated in club skills and rescue practice sessions. And of course we all have the benefit of the online forum on a wide range of topics with lots of lively discussion on all aspects of paddling.

Ciaran himself commented that he had already had a few problems that day and should have dialed things down a bit. That’s a judgment call only he could have made.

The people on the water I respect the most regardless of skill level are not the ones who blindly rush into everything they see or try to impress or keep up with or be cajoled by their friends.

The people I am most impressed by are the ones who have the personal strength to say, “You know, I think I’m going to pass on that,” or “I’m just not feeling it today.” That is not to say you shouldn’t push yourself or be complacent, but rather you should push yourself only when you feel it appropriate. On some days it may be appropriate and on others not. I look for that kind of attitude in those that I paddle with and try to cultivate that sensitivity in myself.

Tony, Bill and I had no indication that something was amiss when we approached the scene where Ciaran was in trouble. Perhaps everyone was just too involved in what was going on and didn’t expect the situation to continue for the length of time that it did.

It should be common practice to blow some whistles, raise some paddles or in some way alert others to an emergency situation. If things resolve themselves for the best, then great, no harm done, but if they don’t, then more resources become available when more folks are aware of something going on.

After we delivered Ciaran to the beach, most of us resumed paddling. Later in the day I helped rescue someone else I saw come out of their boat. Calling it a rescue seems ridiculous compared to earlier events, but I did not blow a whistle before going in. I should have in case it had turned out to be more involved.

At another time near the end of the day, I also capsized in the rocks and while I rolled up and got out fairly quickly, would it have been prudent for those who witnessed it to alert others until I was not only upright but back out of the rocks? A simple whistle blow to alert others just to be on the lookout likely would never hurt. And for an incident that continues, being a bit more vehement in your signaling to actually draw others near then becomes imperative.

Some of the group members later asked me about the decision to call or not call the coast guard. Anders wondered whether he should push the alert on his satellite messenger. Deciding when to use distress signals is a worthwhile debate. As previously mentioned, this situation just continued to drag on in a manner that nobody expected, but then the worst is never expected. When should a call have been made and how do you decide? Should it have been done in this case?

Well, when I spoke with the coast guard following the rescue of Ciaran, they said to call any time you suspect trouble. They recommended calling early. They further stated that calling on VHF radio channel 16 (as opposed to by cell phone) had the advantage of reaching the coast guard but also other boat traffic in the area.

A commercial or recreational vessel nearby could potentially respond even before the coast guard got on scene. In our situation there was a fishing boat sitting within close sight of us. They might have been able to get Ciaran to safety without our having to put him back in a kayak to leave the area. Instead, they remained unaware of our plight.

I always have food in my PFD as a safeguard against hypothermia, fatigue or even just getting cranky from lack of food. For Ciaran I wished I’d had something other than a very chewy fruit leather. In a truly weakened state such as Ciaran’s or a diabetic reaction, it simply takes too much energy to chew and swallow.

In the future I will carry a tube of glucose paste or cake frosting in a PFD pocket. The tubes are small, the paste need not be swallowed (though it can be), as it will absorb through the oral membranes. Thus it is less likely to induce vomiting, is more quickly absorbed into the bloodstream, and is a readily available source of energy.

Warm fluids are great and can be helpful as much psychologically as physically. Be careful though; if they are too hot, consider diluting them with some cooler liquid to avoid the risk of burning the recipient.

I was happy to have my paddle for the swim to and from the rock. Swimming with a paddle is something I often practice just for fun. It comes in handy when wearing full kayak gear, and over the short haul it dramatic improves your swimming speed and power when done right.

Though the rescue knife I carry on my PFD gets used most for spreading peanut butter or cutting foam for outfitting, it’s great to have when it’s really needed. In this case it was only used to regain as much of the anchored towline as we could.

But if something had gone wrong while pulling Ciaran in, it would have been invaluable. I keep it on my left shoulder for easy grabbing with my right hand. I have used it many times to cut sea birds free from fishing line. A knife that won’t be corroded by salt water is best for use in the marine environment.

It is important to be aware of the possibility of secondary drowning. If someone gets too much water in their lungs, the subsequent filling of the lungs with fluid from within the body requires medical treatment even if that person seems to be fine.

This holds true whether you are in salt water or fresh water. Of course the importance of keeping your certification current in first aid, wilderness first aid and/or CPR can’t be overstated. While Ciaran managed to keep from inhaling any water, at least two of us in the group knew to look for signs of secondary drowning before we determined he was safe to go home.

It doesn’t matter how long you’ve been paddling or what your skill level is, taking advantage of additional training is always worthwhile. After more than 17 years of paddling and teaching, I know that the more experience I get, the more I realize I have to learn.

Every change in your gear or routine merits more practice. Something as simple as a new whistle on your PFD can throw a whole new wrinkle in your T-rescue if it gets caught on your deck lines as you try to climb out of the water.

You never know what an emergency will require of you. Anything you can add to your bag of tricks to help you assess situations and solutions may just make a very big difference. Practice everything and practice often. Tony and I have both paddled extensively and participated in numerous training sessions, including time spent practicing self-rescues and swimming to and from rocks with a boat in tow.

The attempts to perform a rescue by kayak, while valiant, were not working. Had we remained in our boats there would have been little else we could have done for Ciaran. I believe it is this training that prompted both of us to come to the conclusions we did independently, and made it possible for us to swim to the rocks where we were in a position to help each other with Ciaran’s rescue. Tony’s decision to dump his boat and climb on the rock may have saved Ciaran’s life.

Ciaran:

Three weeks after the accident I went paddling again for the first time. We did the same trip and made it all the way to Stinson this time. The waves were much bigger than the last time. We all stayed outside for the most part. The slot beside the arch looked a lot different.

I have been paddling for about five years now and consider myself a reasonably good kayaker. It still bothers me that I did not see the danger in that slot. It did not look like a big deal at the time, nothing I hadn’t done before. I hope I recognize this situation in the future.

I can’t say for sure that I will and this does bother me. I hope I don’t start second-guessing everything I do. Hopefully I will get my “mojo” back soon. I love kayaking and I want to keep going out as long as I can get my dry top on by myself.

I truly believe that if Tony had not dumped his boat and climbed up on the rocks, I wouldn’t be here now. I don’t think I would have responded to anyone else’s voice when I believed I was in my last moments.

I can’t thank everyone enough who helped in my rescue. Because Tony, Gregg and Jeff took action, my 11-year-old daughter and my 8-year-old son won’t have to say, “Yeah, we miss our dad, he died in a kayak accident.”

Thanks to Tony Johnson, Jeff Hastings, Elizabeth Rowell, for helping piece together the events. After this incident Glenn Nunez set up a rescue practice and Q&A; session with the local Coast Guard Station. Finally thanks to all of the Bay Area Sea Kayakers for providing critical training, support and feedback when events like this happen.

Gregg Berman is an ER nurse living and playing near San Francisco. He spends time as a tide pool naturalist or teaching kayaking and has been an expedition leader around the country from the Florida Everglades to the Alaskan glaciers.

Ciaran, a native of Dublin, Ireland, moved to the San Francisco Bay Area in 1987 at the age of 22. He is a building contractor, married with two children, living in Sonoma County. He started kayaking six years ago, after his wife bought him lessons as a Christmas gift, a decision she has regretted only occasionally.

A Sidelong Look at the Draw Family: A Guide to Going Sideways

Once while teaching the sculling draw in an instructor certification workshop, I was taken aback when a student—who’d proclaimed earlier about having spent the entire previous winter “guiding professionally” in Baja—informed me that, “Oh, I don’t really know all those fancy instructor strokes.”

His tone clearly indicated that he considered draw strokes to be rather superfluous: good for showing off to impress your paddling buddies, perhaps, but not of much practical use. Like most of us he apparently spent the vast majority of his time in a kayak plodding straight ahead, forward stroke following forward stroke meditatively, ad infinitum toward the ever receding horizon.

I was bewildered, not just because it seemed that someone guiding professionally would know how to make a boat move sideways for safety if not purely aesthetic reasons. Mostly, I was baffled, because I hadn’t even begun to get superfluous with any fancy instructor strokes.

Beyond learning the standard draw (or beam draw), that pull-and-slice draw stroke most of us get shown in our first beginner class, a lot of folks don’t spend much time working on going sideways. We can paddle literally hundreds if not thousands of miles interrupting our forward strokes with only the occasional sweep or rudder stroke to correct our course.

Draw strokes may not get used that often, but knowing how to do them is like knowing how to change a tire, when you need one, you really need one. They can be invaluable in rescue situations for getting to a capsized partner’s bow quickly to do a T-rescue, crucial for maintaining a safe position in an eddy beside a tide rip or behind a rock in an ocean rock garden, and merely handy for rafting up with a buddy before he finishes off the last snack bar.

But even those paddling aesthetes who bother venturing beyond learning the standard draw to learn the more advanced sculling draw tend to stop there. Yet lurking beyond the sculling draw like stills in the hills, hides a whole family of fancy draw strokes, with more relatives and more aliases than a redneck wedding, sporting colorful nicknames like “sideslip,” “Duffek,” and “hanging” draw.

Canoeists of course are familiar with esoteric strokes like cross-bow draws, but then they only have one blade in the water, so to speak. We sea kayakers, with twice the blade opportunities, are obviously at an advantage (if not possibly also more intelligent in our choice of craft). But we tend to be a less dexterous lot.

Learning to do things like reaching across your bow to steer can improve physical as well as mental flexibility, for one thing; and taking the time to become acquainted with techniques like running or static draws—not to mention all their cross-bow, backward and one-handed cousins—can help you learn to glide your kayak gracefully in just about any direction imaginable save up or down, while the blade finesse gained can enhance other skills like bracing and rolling as well.

Beyond being simply useful, draws look good and are good for you. Draws are sexy. Draws make people smile. Besides being more fluid on the water, knowing at least the names, if not having quite mastered all the techniques, will make you more fluent in conversations with serious paddle geeks, all of which can be great for superfluous showing off in order to impress your paddling partners both on and off the water.

Sculling Draw

Let’s start with the sculling draw before moving on to a handful of its more eccentric relatives. Sculling develops a subtle feel for controlling the blade, and better blade control translates directly into better boat control and less wasted effort overall. It also forms the core of all the fancy running or static draws that follow.

Assuming some overall familiarity with the standard draw stroke, a brief review of a few technical nuances is in order. With all draw strokes you want to turn your shoulders to the side and “face your work,” do your best to get a fairly vertical shaft angle by reaching both hands out over the water (with your top arm below eye height and your bottom hand nearly touching the water), fully submerge your blade and, of course, by definition, use the face of your blade, not the back.

The key to mastering the sculling draw is learning to skim your blade evenly—not merely moving sideways, but doing so in a straight line without changing the angle of your kayak. Use a dock or a partner’s boat for reference. It’s common to angle the blade too much, especially when moving it from bow to stern so that it digs in like the much more familiar forward stroke, which pulls the stern around and turns the boat.

Flatten the face of the blade relative to the side of your kayak, with just enough angle that it barely begins to bite into the water; the subtle feel you are looking for is often described as “spreading peanut butter” rather than scraping it off the bread. If you find your bow or stern pivoting toward your paddle, then you are not sculling evenly and are probably angling your blade too much on that side.

Another common mistake is sculling from knee to hip, which draws the boat diagonally forward. To move straight sideways, the hip needs to be at the center of the stroke rather than at the end, which means you need to rotate further back, reaching an equal distance behind you. The final fix for a flawed draw has to do with “slicing” at the point of transition.

At the end of the stroke in either direction, it is important to set the new blade angle before powering the next stroke, or you’ll feel the blade slice for a few inches (to a few feet) before it catches again in the new direction. Practice going slowly and pausing briefly at the end of each stroke to find the proper blade angle before applying power.

Later you can start to speed it up. But the rhythm should always remain relaxed, like a waltz (one, two, three…one, two, three) rather than fast like the twist. Think of Lawrence Welk, in other words, not Chubby Checker.

Directional Sculling and Advanced Techniques

When you can scull your kayak straight sideways, try a variation—sculling at a 45-degree angle backward (or forward), again, without changing your boat angle. Skilled paddlers use this directional sculling to position themselves more precisely in narrow sea caves and rock gardens or in tide rip eddies, or to grab a bow or a piece of floating trash on the side that is just out of reach behind them.

To further develop blade finesse, practice sculling with one hand. Finding the balance point is tricky and subtle, but struggling with it using only one hand will make the two-handed version seem much less awkward.

This also helps teach paddlers using feathered blades to control their off-side sculling (usually the left) with off-side hand, which will ultimately give them more control and a better feel for their off-side blade during strokes and rolls. This one-handed sculling, so I’ve been told, looks kinda cool as well.

Cross-Bow Sculling

Another more challenging technique is cross-bow sculling. Admittedly somewhat superfluous on its own, it develops the skills and feel for the blade that lie at the heart of more advanced techniques.

Invented by canoeists who only had one blade so learned to make the most of it, this technique involves reaching across your bow with the working blade. For example, start sculling on your right side with your right blade. Then pick that blade up out of the water, reach up over your bow as if setting up for a roll, and put the right blade back into the water, blade still facing you, at your left hip.

Generally quite awkward at first, this body- and mind-stretching exercise really helps develop blade finesse. Of course those who want even more challenge (and/or attention) can practice this showy stroke one-handed as well.

Draws Under Way

The ultimate in subtle blade and boat control is gained by applying these various draws when your boat has some forward (or backward) momentum. Precise steering control during carved turns can be achieved using a draw stroke off the bow while under way.

Known by a variety of names, this bow rudder or Duffek is the most efficient way to make subtle course corrections in tight areas, maintaining more speed and directional integrity (allowing your boat to carve on a precise line) than a braking stern rudder stroke, since it pulls your bow into the turn rather than pushing your stern away.

The bow rudder  is essentially the forward end of the sculling draw held stationary near your foot, which helps explains why it is sometimes known as the stationary bow draw although the boat itself must be moving forward.

To find the proper placement (without forward momentum for now), scull slowly from stern to bow on the right side, as far forward as you can reach, maintaining an “open-faced” blade angle. Freeze and hold that open-faced blade angle about a foot off your foot or shin, depending on your flexibility, and remember this precise spot.

Now with momentum, initiate a carved turn with an edge and sweep stroke on the left, then plant your bow rudder off your foot on the right, creating an elegant, gliding, ever-tightening turn. (Make sure you are using the face of the blade, not the back: Using the back of the blade, by definition, constitutes a “pry” not a draw.) At whatever point you are happy with your new direction, pivot the bow rudder neatly into a forward stroke to regain momentum and start paddling again.

Or, to continue the turn, as you finish blending your bow rudder into a forward stroke on the right, reach across your bow with the left blade, as you did for the cross-bow sculling, and plant a cross-bow rudder with your left blade next to your right foot. Unless engaging in some extremely fancy maneuvering in very tight places, the justification for a practical application for using cross-bow rudders with a double-bladed kayak paddle begins to wear thin and disappears entirely for one-handed versions.

However superfluous and showy, both techniques are excellent “over-compensation” exercises for refining blade finesse, and may wow certain paddling partners, assuming they are rather easily impressed. Similarly, using a stern draw when paddling backward is a great way to glide your boat quickly back into a safe spot in a rock garden between waves, but beyond that it is mainly a good way to practice getting more comfortable in your kayak, not such a bad goal in and of itself.

Sideslips

Moving back to something more practical, a sideslip is essentially the same stroke as a bow rudder, only you do it off your hip instead of up by your feet. Instead of turning the boat, your goal is to have it glide diagonally off course a few feet, to dodge past a submerged rock or stalled kayaker, without actually turning your boat. If you used a turn to go off course to miss an obstacle, you then have to turn back on course.

With a sideslip, you drift off your collision course without actually changing your boat angle, then continue on your way with little loss of momentum. It is also a great way to slide quickly toward something, like the bow of a capsized kayak. I routinely use this for T-rescues in rough water, as it helps keep the waves from knocking me off course and missing my swimmer’s bow.

Like the bow rudder, the blade angle is subtle. A common difficulty when practicing sideslips is that you find your boat turning toward the blade as it does during a bow rudder. This happens because paddlers typically plant the sideslip too far forward, next to their thigh, instead of back by their butt. Each kayak is different, so you’ll need to experiment with finding the “sweet spot” where yours drifts sideways without turning.

One way to practice this is to intentionally plant the blade too far back behind your butt and as you feel the stern start to turn toward the paddle, start to scull gently forward until the turn stops. Another common mistake is edging the kayak. Since you don’t want to turn in this case, don’t initiate one with your lower body. Keep the boat flat.

The advanced manner to initiate a sideslip is to blend the end of your forward stroke into a sideslip at your hip without taking your paddle out of the water. Instead of lifting your blade at the end of your forward stroke, quickly cock your wrist outward and into a sideslip position just as the stroke reaches your hip.

Then glide sideways past whatever obstacle, real or imagined, you are trying to avoid, and resume paddling. Paddlers with a penchant for superfluous skills development or just plain showing off can of course practice whatever combination of one-handed, cross-bow, backward sideslips they fancy in the name of enhancing overall comfort and control.

I sometimes goof around with members of the draw family, like sideslips and bow rudders, as they are an entertaining bunch that helps make the paddling more interesting on long, flat-water tours. By following a few inches off the stern of another paddler, you can judge how much your boat is moving sideways or turning, since this can be difficult to assess on open water. But remember, this is not a big move; you only need to glide sideways a foot or so to avoid an obstacle before continuing on your way, losing as little momentum as possible. For extra momentum, try to sneak in a partial forward stroke at the end of a sideslip as you lift the blade out of the water.

I observe groups of skilled paddlers using a more useful form of this exercise subconsciously. Once, when teaching another group of instructors, I noticed that we were all paddling close enough to chat in more or less conversational tones during a crossing of San Francisco Bay to Angel Island. Everyone was able to maintain a distance of only a few feet between boats.

This was in stark contrast to the group of beginners I’d been teaching the day before, who either crashed into one another if they got too close or drifted so far apart to avoid doing so that most communication had to be done through shouting across the water like an unruly mob of barking sea lions. Instead, our group was conversing in civil tones, discussing the finer points of navigating in tidal currents.

At one point I was listening to a woman on my right describing her experience the past several summers teaching in Alaska, when we drifted close enough to almost touch paddles. Simultaneously we both threw in a quick sideslip, she on her right, me on my left, glided apart a few feet, and kept on paddling. She never broke stride in her story, and it was so quick and smooth I almost didn’t notice what we’d done.

Then I started looking around at others. Without seeming to give it a second thought, or skipping a beat in their conversations, everyone was deftly using the occasional sideslip or bow rudder to keep from running into each other or from drifting too far apart. And it dawned on me that these fancy instructor strokes, not only looked pretty cool, they were pretty darned useful as well.

Leaving Australia’s West Coast in her wake

In early September Freya called me by cell phone while she was taking a day off near Lancelin, a town about 75 miles north of Perth in Western Australia. Poised to turn the corner and take on Australia’s southern coast, she had over 6,000 miles (9,700 km) behind her. She was outside of her tent and looking at her kayak. I could hear the wind rasping across her cell phone.

It sounds windy. Are you outside?

I was just looking on the bottom of my boat and I have a bit of a hole. Something to repair, I reckon. Yesterday I was paddling close to shore and hit a bit of a reef here and there. The damage doesn’t look too bad but I need to fix it.

Will you be meeting up with Greg in Perth? (Greg Bethune, a charter boat operator Freya met at the Gulf of Carpentaria is now her partner and plans to provide support for Freya as she paddles the south coast.)

No, he’s going to meet me at the end of September. We’ll meet around Augusta, right at the southern corner [of the west coast], so there are still three to four weeks to go. We may have a couple of days off to get the van Greg bought in Perth set up to support the whole thing, do some shopping and then get going again.

It looks like it’s going to be nice and easy weather for the next few days, at least. That’s what I saw on the long-term forecast. Yesterday was lovely but today is horrible. Last night and today the wind was supposed to be from the southwest and it’s exactly that. It was blowing like heck at night and I was stupidly camped right on the open beach.

I should have been hiding in the dunes but I didn’t expect the wind to be so strong. My tent eventually got buried in a sand dune but I was nice and warm in my sleeping bag. That was the most important thing. I got sandblasted and the sand came under the tent fly and through the mosquito net. That’s just the way it is when you camp on the beach in the wind.

Are you out of the tropical weather and into cooler temperatures?

It’s pretty chilly at night so I had to add this blanket thing to my sleeping bag. My thin sleeping bag isn’t holding up to the cold anymore. I already got a fleece blanket and just a couple of days ago borrowed a down duvet as an extra cover. It’s nice and warm.

During the day it’s cool—not really hot, not really cold. The nights are coolish. It’s a lot like German summer weather. It’s not bad, but it’s not inviting to jump in the water at the end of the day. The water is still about 20 degrees [Celsius] (68° F), but I’m spoiled. It’s supposed to be getting better again because it is getting to be summer again. Now it is the springtime weather and I have three or three and a half months to go. With summer coming it should be hot again. We’ll see.

How was the passage along the Zuytdorp Cliffs? (The cliffs span a distance of 170 kilometers and preclude landing anywhere along their length.)

We were waiting for the right weather window. That’s why I was sitting in Denham for a couple of days. Then the weather was right. The forecast was good for the two days I’d need to paddle along the cliffs. There was supposed to be a following wind, and there was during the days, but at night it was quite rough.

There was a front that came through that nobody predicted—none of my three different weather forecasters had. So it was quite lumpy and bumpy with a strong wind at night, instead of the calm that had been forecasted. I knew there was going to be no moon, but I was not expecting having no stars and no open sky at all. I didn’t have any visual horizon for sixty to seventy percent of the whole night. Instead of paddling I could only lie on my back deck to stabilize myself with my paddle.

I stupidly didn’t take my floats like I did on the big crossing [the Gulf of Carpentaria] because I couldn’t afford to take time to sleep. I had to be paddling all night to get done before nightfall on the following day. So I wasn’t thinking about taking my floats. I was not expecting having no visual horizon, but that’s what happened. And then it was very, very rough. I’m very good at balance, no doubt about that, but if you have no visual horizon and big water you simply can’t paddle.

So it just wasn’t working. I had breakers crashing over my boat every now and then. It was nice that I had following seas, so for at last three quarters of the night they pushed me in the right direction when I was not paddling. Later on the weather turned and was pushing me toward the cliffs. I had my GPS on and I could watch how close I was getting. I was getting closer and closer and eventually I had to sit up and do a little bit of paddling that would take me away from the cliffs.

There was a bit of a horizon then, but five times it rained so it was completely dark. The few stars I had were over me instead of on the horizon. The horizon was always covered by big clouds. It was not what I expected. I had never experienced that [loss of horizon at night] so I was basically lying on the back deck and surviving the whole thing stabilizing myself with the paddle alone. I was in a basically empty boat so it was tippier than usual.

The lighter kayak was good for strong paddling but lying on the back deck I had to put the paddle out to one side to feel the water instead of relaxing and doing nothing as I’d usually be doing [in that position]. I really had to clamp my grip on the paddle and feel the water all the time; otherwise I was not comfortable in the complete darkness and crashing breakers. There was no chance of seeing anything so I just had to feel and hear for when the breakers would come over me.

That’s what I needed to do to survive until morning. It was only survival, nothing else. At least I was pushed in the right direction. I got no rest at all. It was highly stressful for the mind and body. I didn’t get any naps throughout the whole thing. I was fully awake and in full survival mode.

Were you annoyed at yourself for having left the floats behind?

Oh yes. That was definitely a mistake. The next two sets of cliffs I will definitely take the floats. [At Zuytdorp] everything came together: no moon, no stars because it was raining, the visual horizon was gone and the seas were… well it was not much fun.

In the middle of the Great Australian Bight there are two sets of cliffs of similar length. We’ll see what kind of moon and stars I’ll get at night. It will be better there than at Zuytdorp because there are roads that go right along the cliffs. If I carry a light, drivers will be able to see me down there on the water. It’s kind of funny.

[At Zuytdorp] I had a headlamp I could shine around a bit and see some of the breakers that were coming. Shining it around a bit was all I was comfortable with. I couldn’t shine it on my GPS or my chart without getting blinded. At night I usually leave my GPS on with its light on a very low level so I can check it. The headlamp was all right because I could at least see the top of a breaker coming. It was better than nothing but it was definitely scary. I was not scared to death, but I really was very aware that I needed to just hold on and wait for the daylight to come.

The next day there was just a bit of headwind, but luckily it shifted and the seas calmed down. I made good progress. I had to keep myself awake by singing. I didn’t get any rest that night. No sleep, nothing. I had to keep on paddling, but it was all right. I was doing different movements at night but not paddling—I’d just been pressing on my paddle as an outrigger—so in the morning the paddling was good. I was making seven kilometers per hour.

It’s a big difference paddling an empty boat. [Terry Bolland of Perth drove to Denham and shuttled the bulk of Freya’s gear to Kalbarri at the south end of the cliffs.] It adds about one and a half to two kilometers more per hour. This will make a big difference when I have my support crew.

You don’t think the lower stability of an unloaded boat will be a problem?

No, I don’t think so. If you want to rest it makes a difference. If you lie on the back deck it’s not that nice. But I don’t really need to rest that much.

What effect did your successful crossing of the Gulf of Carpentaria have on your approach to the cliffs? Did that eight-day crossing make you think that an overnight passage along the cliffs wouldn’t be much of a challenge?

Exactly. That’s what I thought to myself. When I was about ten Ks away from the cliffs I was not that scared about being pushed into them, even when the wind shifted in the last quarter of the night. I didn’t feel any rebound from the cliffs.

Even if I would have had my floats and had a bit of sleep I wouldn’t have felt rested because you never know what the current and wind might do. Close your eyes and then the cliffs are suddenly there.

The GPS tells you where you are and this is quite nice compared to Paul’s [Caffyn] day. He had a pitch-dark night as well. Basically I wasn’t really scared of the cliffs at all. I’m used to paddling through the night without getting any sleep, so one night is all right.

But if you paddle with fear it’s much more stressful. I had more stress there after that single night going without sleep and with high attention to surviving than the eight days [of Carpentaria] with decent sleep at night. I was more mentally tired—not physically tired. I know how it feels having no sleep at night—working through the night more than dancing through the night actually.

I’ve spent more time working at my shop all night than I have partying all night. The body needs a rest. That may be the reason a virus caught me. [Freya was ill for five days after reaching Kalbarri.] Maybe without the stress I wouldn’t have caught it.

With many of the worst challenges behind you were the cliffs a reminder that you can’t let your guard down?

I don’t have the worst behind me yet at all. There are lots of things coming up in the Southern Ocean. There are two more sets of cliffs. I’ll definitely be carrying my floats so it can’t be so scary as Zuytdorp. Big swells will be there and huge, ugly seas.

I would rather paddle through the crocodile country again with flat seas than deal with fat, heavy seas. But I’m going to make it. I’ll have limited landing spots but I’ll have to go for it. It will be similar to [my circumnavigation of the south island of] New Zealand. Pick the right day, wait for the waves to be low enough and the wind to be fair enough.

Has Greg arranged to support you along the southern coast?

Yes, that’s 100 percent sure. He may have to leave for a week in November but after that he’ll be back. [An Australian paddler] David Winkworth said he’d be happy to support me in the Great Australian Bight.

Will he be paddling with you or on shore driving?

No, I don’t want him to paddle with me. I don’t want anyone to paddle with me for more than an hour. He volunteered to help me along the Bight, so there may be two guys in the four-wheel drive.

Is wanting to paddle alone a bit of a change? Before the trip you entertained the idea of having someone paddle with you, especially across the Gulf of Carpentaria. Are you now set on paddling alone?

Yes, I had been looking for someone to paddle with me, but I’m happy in the long run not having anybody around. It’s definitely now the case that I won’t paddle with anybody for longer than an hour on this trip. That’s usually when I’m getting into or out of a town.

I’ve changed my mind about the [land-based ] support thing, for sure, because I want to be with Greg. It will be nice to have the support. It changes the rest of the trip quite a lot. If I were to compare what I’ve done so far with what Paul [Caffyn] did with a support crew, it’s simply easier with support, not only with paddling but also mentally, plus with setting up camp, organizing things and all the logistical stuff I have to do by myself.

What would be the problem with having someone paddle with you?

I just don’t feel comfortable with probably anybody on this long trip. I want to stop when I want to stop, rest when I want to rest and eat when I want to eat. I don’t think there are many female paddlers around [who could join me] and the men are always trying to race me.

This is what I’ve experienced. I had two guys paddle with me for a half day. They started out paddling with me but eventually they were just pulling ahead and showing me “I’m the bigger paddler.” They were paddling an empty boat and they’re tall, strong and very aggressive guys, and I had a fully loaded boat and had already paddled quite a bit not only on that day. What’s that worth?

With a support crew you’ll be traveling lighter and faster. Do you also anticipate a psychological advantage knowing that there will be someone waiting for you at the end of the day?

Well, it’s very nice, especially if it’s your own partner. With anybody else it’s nice as well, and you’re motivated to keep on going to get to a certain meeting point instead of just pulling ashore at a nice landing spot if you’re tired. It definitely motivates you to make a little bit more distance.

Three days ago I was lucky to have somebody help me [along the coast] south of Port Denison. Some people who just met me at the beach and traveled [on shore] with me for two days. So I had a nearly empty boat for those two days. I had bloody hard headwinds and with a fully loaded boat I would have just stopped. It makes such a difference to have support. To know that somebody will be there who’ll already know what I’d like to eat at night and what needs to be shopped for helps a lot for my organizing.

Are you concerned about how people might view your trip when you go from unsupported to supported?

Sorry, I don’t give a [expletive deleted]! It’s my trip. If anybody wants to do the upper portion of the Great Australian Bight unsupported, he can try that, but there simply is no water. That’s the issue. I really need to think of my water spots and how much water I’m going to carry. The water issue is the main thing for support.

I also just want to get done as soon as possible. I’ve been doing it for so long now that I don’t mind if it’s done. I won’t feel sorry when [the circumnavigation is] finished.

On the north coast water was no problem. Even in the Kimberleys there were enough people around [who could give me water]. In the Great Australian Bight there is no water and even if there were people, anyone who is just pulling off the road can’t just go up to a roadhouse and turn on the water tap. You have to buy water in big canisters. You might be able to get water from people driving the road but there are not that many people traveling on that road. There simply is no water.

I could carry my desalinator, which I haven’t yet used [and is in storage in Melbourne], but I haven’t calculated if I really would need it. I haven’t calculated it out; it’s just easier this way [using a support crew].

It has started raining now so I have to climb into my tent. This is bloody ugly weather. [sound of tent zippers] I’ve got too much sand in here. Everything is coated with sand. How funny is that? At least it’s warm and dry.”

Waterproof Digital Photography

2001 was a pivotal year for on-the-water digital cameras (digicams). Little cameras were cautiously popping out of dry bags, and paddlers rafted up to view the results on tiny liquid crystal display (LCD) screens on the backs of the cameras. Digital images produced by these hi-tech wonders could be e-mailed to friends and family or even sent from expeditions via satellite phone to be loaded daily onto Web sites. Digital does away with film and developing expenses-just transfer the files to your computer, and you’re ready to go again. With in-camera editing, movie modes, “stitched” panoramas, reasonable prices, and new compact waterproof cases-digital has come to kayaking.

For 2002, prices are dropping, and the number of features are rising. The cost of memory, a big bugaboo just last year, has dropped through the floor. 128-MB memory cards sell for under $60 and have the capacity to store a dozen to hundreds of images, depending on image dimensions.

Waterproof cases for select digital cameras from Canon, Sony and Olympus first hit the market in 2000. Underwater housings for digicams have been available before, but they’ve been much bulkier and more expensive than the new compact cases. They hold the cameras securely, are lightweight, and take up only a little more space than a 35mm point-and-shoot. This year’s models are depth-rated to 100 ft or more, great for snorkeling, diving-or kayaking. External, O-ring sealed buttons control most or all of the camera functions.

Digital Primer

When you are shopping for digital cameras you need to understand how they work in order to choose the one that best suits your needs. The following is a list of features that you need to consider.

• Megapixels and resolution: The light-sensitive sensors that make up the CCD (charge-coupled device) in the camera are referred to as pixels. More pixels means higher resolution for bigger and sharper images. Digicams usually list the dimensions of the images they record in pixels: the Canon S30’s 2048×1536 image has 3,145,728 or roughly 3.2 Megapixels. If all you want is to send e-mail pictures, 640×480 is fine. Good 8×10 prints, require a 3 or 4 Megapixel digicam.

• Focal lengths of digital cameras differ from film. The CCD area is smaller than 35mm film, so a 7-21mm zoom may be equivalent to 35205mm in 35mm. Digicams usually list 35mm equivalents.

• Optical zooms use moving lens elements. 2x or 3x optical zooms are typical. I like 3x, in the 35205 range, for nice wide-angle to short-telephoto coverage.

• Digital zoom extends the range of optical zoom only by cropping and consequently reduces resolution. It’s useful only if you want low-resolution images for things like e-mail. Optical Zoom is the real deal.

• LCD and viewfinders: LCD screens consume valuable battery power and are tough to see in bright light. You’ll use the optical viewfinder to save power and frame pictures in bright light. That said, try to get a bright LCD. You’ll use it on the water to check framing and exposure. A waterproof case may partially block the viewfinder especially at the wide angle end of the zoom.

• Batteries: Many digicams require proprietary lithium-ion batteries. They are compact and have excellent storage capacity-twice that of NiCd’s- but with the LCD screen on and some in-camera editing, a few hours is all you’ll get before the battery runs down. This is fine for day trips, and possibly overnights, but for extended paddles you’ll want a few spares (at about $50 apiece). Recharge from an AC outlet takes 1 to 2 hours. Some digicams take AA batteries.

Digicams eat power too quickly for regular use of alkaline AAs, so it’s best to use rechargeables. NIMH (Nickel-Metal Halide) have 40% more capacity than NiCad’s (Nickel-Cadmium) and can be recharged without being fully discharged. And you’ll be charging a lot. A NIMH charger and a dozen batteries will handle weekend-long excursions. For expeditions, solar chargers available commercially for NIMH batteries would tip the scales toward AA’s.

• Image storage format: JPEG, a compressed format designed for photographic images, is the most common. Compressed images take less storage space, but at the expense of image quality. If you want top-quality images, digicams with TIFF compression will retain the highest image quality.

• Memory: The removable memory cards differ: Canon uses CompactFlash; Olympus uses SmartMedia; Sony has a proprietary Memory Stick. You can process your images with your computer and printer or take your memory card to a digital mini-lab or kiosk to make low-cost prints.

• Variable ISO: The light sensitivity of the CCD is listed in equivalencies of ISO ratings for film and can be changed to suit the image. You’ll have the flexibility to capture action in low light at ISO 400, and, moments later, a tripod-mounted, color-saturated sunset at ISO 50.

• USB (Universal Serial Bus) port: Most new digicams come with a cable to connect to the computer USB port for downloading images. If your computer was manufactured in 1998 or later, it almost surely has USB.

• Video port: Some cameras have a video port so you can view the pictures on your TV or transfer images to a video tape.

• Web publication: If you want images for e-mail or Web use, any low-end digicam will surpass your need. E-mail and Web images are best kept small. A 480×640 pixel, low-quality JPEG is usually as big as you’ll need and will download quickly.

• Print publication: Most magazines, including Sea Kayaker, print photographs at 300 dpi (dots per inch). This means the top-quality 2048×1536 image from the 3.2 Megapixel Canon S30 (reviewed below) will print no larger than 5″ x 7″, or half a page. Newspapers print at 150 dpi, so a 3.2 pixel image will work for 10″ x 14″. For home printing, 200 dpi generally makes very satisfactory prints.

• White balance: Many digicams allow you to adjust color balance, a great feature when indoors. For kayakers, it’s a plus in the pool, or while snorkeling, or while ashore in shade.

• Waterproof case: Finally, the reason to consider on-the-water digital in the first place: the availability of compact waterproof housings that allow camera operation by way of external buttons. This years cases are rated for submersion to 100 feet or more, and made from ABS plastic that should take some abuse. The cases aren’t pocket-sized, as the cameras are, but the extra bulk makes the camera easier to handle. The extension of the case around the zoom lens is likely to partly block the viewfinder. In addition, some of the camera functions may not be accessible via the buttons.

CANON POWERSHOT S30

Canon’s 3.2 Megapixel Powershot S30 and WP-DC300 waterproof case represent the best of what waterproof digital photography has to offer. (The 4.0 Megapixel S40 fits the same case.) The S30 has a range of automatic and manual controls that surpasses most film SLR’s. Canon’s A1, A2, S110 and S300 also have housings available, and are more like point-and-shoots in capabilities.

The S30’s brushed aluminum casing feels solid. The lens is protected by a cover that slides to reveal the lens and turn the camera on. The LCD is large (1.8″ diagonal) for the size of the camera.

The camera comes with a 16 MB CompactFlash memory card, Lithium-ion battery and charger, USB cable, Video cable, wrist strap, and Canon and ArcSoft software for the Mac or PC. It’s Windows XP compatible, and allows direct printing to the Canon CP20 Card Photo and S8210 Bubble Jet printers. The manual is easy to understand, with a good index. Other features are three-point autofocus, and an array of 13 exposure modes for automatic to complete manual control. Exposure sensitivity can be varied from 50 ISO to an amazing 800. The flash has all the right control options: auto, on, off, and auto or on red-eye reduction.

The camera’s shooting mode dial has icons that are intuitive, like a portrait icon for portrait mode or a mountain for scenic mode. Some you’ll need the manual to explain, like the palette-shaped icon that allows you to change your color intensity or black-and-white or sepia. There is also a movie mode and panorama stitch-assist mode. In replay mode you can view histograms (light profiles) and add voice messages for each image.

The shutter speed covers a wide range from 1/1500 to 15 seconds, and you can shoot in manual aperture- or shutter-priority modes. Apertures go from f/2.8 to f/8.0, a small range compared to a 35mm SLR, but in digital, f/8 gives excellent depth of field at the wide angle end of the zoom.

If you frame the image and completely press the shutter button, there will be a delay of about 1/2 second before the camera records the image. As with most digicams you can eliminate the lag by pushing the button halfway to prefocus. Then when you fully press the button, image capture is instantaneous.

The high-speed mode snaps 3 frames per second until the buffer fills up. You can hold down the shutter and reel off frame after frame of medium-sized JPEG’s, or 5 large-size, fine-quality JPEG’s. In low-light conditions the shutter rate may be slower.

Images are saved in three sizes of JPEG-2048×1536, 1024×768 or 640×480- or as a RAW file. The JPEGs can be saved at three levels of compression, giving you lots of storage options. Canon claims the RAW compression is “lossless,” that is, no information from the CCD is lost, yet file size is 1/2 the size of TIFF files. The RAW files I shot averaged 2.4 MB, and the 16 MB card has room for five. When converted to TIFF on my computer for use with photo manipulation software like Adobe Photoshop or the Canon’s ArcSoft Camera suite, they ballooned to 9 MB.

You can switch from picture-taking to replay with a flip of a switch. Images can be reviewed in the LCD singly or nine smaller images at a time. The 6x magnifier and scrolling functions allow you to check the image sharpness.

The movie feature got me hooked. The camera allows recordings of up to 30 seconds (320×240) or 2 minutes (160×120), complete with sound from the built-in microphone. The movies are saved as AVI files. You can play back the movies on the LCD and erase and reshoot if you don’t like what you got. A speaker in the camera allows you to hear playback sound as well. Even in the small file size the movies provide enough detail to critique paddle strokes. You can edit these down to show highlights for a practical-sized e-mail, or string them together for longer movie viewing on your computer. At 15 frame per second, the movies aren’t jerky. Even in the poor lighting of an indoor pool, they can readily capture an underwater roll sequence. Played back and blown-up on the computer the movies may not be video quality, but they are useful and fun.

With Stitch-Assist you can make panoramas. The LCD screen a shows half of the previous picture, so you can line up the next one. The stitching performed pretty well when I put the images together in the software program. RAW format is unavailable in this mode.

The Software

The camera has a street price of $599 and comes with a USB port and cable, and two CD’s with image organizing/editing software The software loaded into a Macintosh iBook and a PC with Windows 2000 without a hitch. In 10 minutes we were viewing pictures and, with the supplied Quicktime Player 5.0, watching movies. We loaded the software into a PC with Windows 98 but were unable to retrieve any images or video after 30 minutes of trying. With the Canon software you can organize files, crop images for e-mail, and merge photos in Photostitch. The ArcSoft software includes PhotoImpressions and VideoImpressions for image and movie editing.

The 8″x10″ picture I printed from a 2048×1536 image fine-quality, JPEG file, was very good, matching what I could do on my printer with film and a good-quality film scanner.

THE WP-DC300 WATERPROOF CASE

The WP-DC300 case is clear ABS plastic with bright yellow and green buttons and a blue latch.

The buttons allow control of all the camera functions except on off. Before you put the camera in the housing, you need to slide the clamshell cover from over the lens, which turns on the camera. The camera then fits snugly into the case, and the clasp closure puts a reassuring bit of pressure on the seal. Unfortunately, there is no way to turn the camera on and off once the camera is inside the case. To save power, I turned off the LCD display with one of the case buttons, and used the viewfinder for picture taking on-the-water. Canon recommends opening the case only in a place “of low humidity well away from salty sea air.” It might be a good idea to tape a (very) small desiccant packet inside the case. With the LCD on only intermittently, a fully-charged battery lasted for a day trip. By evening the low-battery warning flashed when I turned on the LCD. It’s too bad this top-of-the-line, waterproof-case-compatible digital has this limitation. Canon’s other cameras and Sony’s DSC P1, P3 and P5can be powered on and off by a button in their waterproof cases.

The case is about the size of a 35mm SLR film camera with a small lens and has enough buoyancy to float the camera. Its thickness makes it awkward to wedge inside your PFD and it’s too big for a PFD pocket, so a deck bag or day hatch would be good stowage options.

On a sunny day, I found the LCD hard to see, even with the display brightened. It’s easy enough to frame a picture, but not to see details. In overcast light this isn’t too much of a problem. I found I didn’t like relying on the optical viewfinder exclusively, though, even though it saves energy. The view is small and about a third of the wide angle view is blocked by the lens extension. Whether I used the LCD or the viewfinder, I found I wanted to check the replay to be sure I got the shot.

The housing really shined at the pool. The LCD screen was easy to see underwater. Recording little movies of roll practice was a snap. Toggle to replay-and hey-there’s my paddle digging too deep on an offside roll.

The case, with a $179 to $199 street price, comes with anti-fog liquid for the front glass and silicone grease for the door seal. The manual is full of warnings about handling that “may cause leaks.” Don’t expect Canon to warranty the camera if you screw up and trash the camera.

The waterproof case, aside from the camera’s lack of an on off button, is superb. The combination of the new compact submersible housings and new versatile digicams offer lots of possibilities especially for day trips, or weekends where battery life is not an issue. If you’re a point-and-shoot photographer, you’ll find the Canon S30 easy to use, but probably more camera than you’ll need. If you’re a dedicated SLR shooter looking for picture-taking control in a small package, the Canon S30 camera is probably the smallest camera in its class that gives you so many features. You won’t find any complications, and will be thrilled at the possibilities.